Suppr超能文献

基于补偿器的FFF射束调强放疗中的表面剂量和周边剂量。

Superficial and peripheral dose in compensator-based FFF beam IMRT.

作者信息

Zhang Daniel G, Feygelman Vladimir, Moros Eduardo G, Latifi Kujtim, Hoffe Sarah, Frakes Jessica, Zhang Geoffrey G

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jan;18(1):151-156. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12018. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Abstract

Flattening filter-free (FFF) beams produce higher dose rates. Combined with compensator-based intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques, the dose delivery for each beam can be much shorter compared to the flattened beam MLC-based or flattened beam compensator-based IMRT. This 'snap shot' IMRT delivery is beneficial to patients for tumor motion management. Due to softer energy, superficial doses in FFF beam treatment are usually higher than those from flattened beams. Due to no flattening filter, thus less photon scattering, peripheral doses are usually lower in FFF beam treatment. However, in compensator-based IMRT using FFF beams, the compensator is in the beam pathway. Does it introduce beam hardening effects and scattering such that the superficial dose is lower and peripheral dose is higher compared to FFF beam MLC-based IMRT? This study applied Monte Carlo techniques to investigate the superficial and peripheral doses in compensator-based IMRT using FFF beams and compared it to the MLC-based IMRT using FFF beams and flattened beams. Besides varying thicknesses of brass slabs to simulate varying thicknesses of compensators, a simple cone-shaped compensator was simulated to mimic a clinical application. The dose distribution in water phantom by the cone-shaped compensator was then simulated by multiple MLC-defined FFF and flattened beams with varying apertures. After normalization to the maximum dose, D, the superficial and peripheral doses were compared between the FFF beam compensator-based IMRT and FFF/flattened beam MLC-based IMRT. The superficial dose at the central 0.5 mm depth was about 1% (of D) lower in the compensator-based 6 MV FFF (6FFF) IMRT compared to the MLC-based 6FFF IMRT, and about 8% higher than the flattened 6 MV MLC-based IMRT dose. At 8 cm off-axis at depth of central maximum dose, d, the peripheral dose between the 6FFF and flattened 6 MV MLC demonstrated similar doses, while the compensator dose was about 1% (of D) higher. Compensators reduce the superficial doses slightly compared to open FFF beams, but increases the peripheral doses due to scatter in the compensator.

摘要

无均整器(FFF)射束可产生更高的剂量率。与基于补偿器的调强放射治疗(IMRT)技术相结合,与基于均整射束的MLC或基于均整射束补偿器的IMRT相比,每个射束的剂量输送时间可以大大缩短。这种“快照式”IMRT输送方式对患者的肿瘤运动管理有益。由于能量较软,FFF射束治疗中的表面剂量通常高于均整射束的表面剂量。由于没有均整器,因此光子散射较少,FFF射束治疗中的周边剂量通常较低。然而,在使用FFF射束的基于补偿器的IMRT中,补偿器位于射线路径上。它是否会引入射束硬化效应和散射,从而使表面剂量低于基于FFF射束MLC的IMRT,而周边剂量更高?本研究应用蒙特卡罗技术研究了使用FFF射束的基于补偿器的IMRT中的表面剂量和周边剂量,并将其与使用FFF射束和均整射束的基于MLC的IMRT进行比较。除了改变黄铜板的厚度以模拟不同厚度的补偿器外,还模拟了一个简单的锥形补偿器以模拟临床应用。然后通过具有不同孔径的多个MLC定义的FFF和均整射束模拟锥形补偿器在水模体中的剂量分布。在归一化至最大剂量D后,比较了基于FFF射束补偿器的IMRT和基于FFF/均整射束MLC的IMRT之间的表面剂量和周边剂量。与基于MLC的6FFF IMRT相比,基于补偿器的6MV FFF(6FFF)IMRT在中心0.5mm深度处的表面剂量低约1%(相对于D),比基于均整的6MV MLC的IMRT剂量高约8%。在中心最大剂量深度d处离轴8cm处,6FFF和均整的6MV MLC之间的周边剂量显示相似,而补偿器剂量高约1%(相对于D)。与开放的FFF射束相比,补偿器会略微降低表面剂量,但由于补偿器中的散射会增加周边剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f66/5689887/b0a761c6d856/ACM2-18-151-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验