Barros Aluisio J D, Santos Leonardo Pozza, Wehrmeister Fernando, Motta Janaina Vieira Dos Santos, Matijasevich Alicia, Santos Ina S, Menezes Ana M B, Gonçalves Helen, Assunção Maria Cecília Formoso, Horta Bernardo L, Barros Fernando C
Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, 1160 - 3o piso, 96020-220, Pelotas, Brazil.
Federal University of Pampa, Itaqui, Brazil.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4165-3.
Association between caesarian section (C-section) and obesity is controversial and mostly based on body mass index (BMI), which has inherent limitations. Using direct estimates of body fat mass, we aimed to assess the association between C-section and adiposity using fat mass index and BMI z-score in three birth cohort studies from Pelotas, Brazil.
We measured weight, height and fat mass (using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)) at ages 6, 18 and 30 years among participants in the 2004, 1993 and 1982 population-based Pelotas Birth Cohort Studies, respectively. We used multiple linear regression analysis to examine the crude and adjusted association between C-section and the body composition indicators. We also modelled height as an outcome to explore the presence of residual confounding.
We observed that fat mass index and BMI z-score were strongly and positively associated with C-section in the crude analysis. However, when we adjusted for socioeconomic characteristics, maternal BMI, parity, age and smoking during pregnancy, effect estimates were attenuated towards the null, except for 30-year-old women. In those women from the 1982 cohort, C-section remained associated with fat mass index (β = 0.82; CI95% 0.32;1.32) and BMI z-score (β = 0.15; CI95% 0.03;0.28), even after adjusting for all potential confounders, suggesting an increase in fat mass index and BMI at 30 years among those born by C-section.
We found no consistent association of C-section with fat mass index measured by DXA and BMI z-score in individuals aged 6, 18 and 30 years, except for women in the latter group, which might be explained by residual confounding. Confounding by socioeconomic and maternal characteristics accounted for all the other associations.
剖宫产与肥胖之间的关联存在争议,且大多基于身体质量指数(BMI),而BMI存在固有局限性。我们利用体脂质量的直接估计值,旨在通过巴西佩洛塔斯的三项出生队列研究,使用脂肪质量指数和BMI z评分来评估剖宫产与肥胖的关联。
我们分别在2004年、1993年和1982年基于人群的佩洛塔斯出生队列研究的参与者6岁、18岁和30岁时测量了体重、身高和脂肪质量(使用双能X线吸收法(DXA))。我们使用多元线性回归分析来检验剖宫产与身体成分指标之间的粗略关联和调整后的关联。我们还将身高作为一个结果进行建模,以探索残余混杂因素的存在。
在粗略分析中,我们观察到脂肪质量指数和BMI z评分与剖宫产呈强烈正相关。然而,当我们调整社会经济特征、母亲BMI、产次、年龄和孕期吸烟情况后,除30岁女性外,效应估计值向无效值减弱。在1982年队列中的那些女性中,即使在调整了所有潜在混杂因素后,剖宫产仍与脂肪质量指数(β = 0.82;95%CI 0.32;1.32)和BMI z评分(β = 0.15;95%CI 0.03;0.28)相关,这表明剖宫产出生的人在30岁时脂肪质量指数和BMI有所增加。
我们发现,除了后一组女性外,在6岁、18岁和30岁的个体中,剖宫产与通过DXA测量的脂肪质量指数和BMI z评分之间没有一致的关联,这可能是由残余混杂因素所解释。社会经济和母亲特征的混杂因素解释了所有其他关联。