基于护士的病例管理与常规护理对老年心肌梗死患者的3年成本效益:KORINNA随访研究结果

The 3-Year Cost-Effectiveness of a Nurse-Based Case Management versus Usual Care for Elderly Patients with Myocardial Infarction: Results from the KORINNA Follow-Up Study.

作者信息

Seidl Hildegard, Hunger Matthias, Meisinger Christa, Kirchberger Inge, Kuch Bernhard, Leidl Reiner, Holle Rolf

机构信息

Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Neuherberg, Germany.

Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Neuherberg, Germany.

出版信息

Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):441-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the 3-year cost-effectiveness of a nurse-based case management intervention in elderly patients with myocardial infarction from a societal perspective.

METHODS

The intervention consisted of one home visit and quarterly telephone calls in the first year, and semi-annual calls in the following 2 years. The primary effect measures were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), on the basis of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and adjusted life-years from patients' self-rated health states according to the visual analogue scale (VAS-ALs). A linear regression model was used for adjusted life-years and a gamma model for costs. Estimation uncertainty was addressed by cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, which indicate the likelihood of cost-effectiveness for a given value of willingness to pay. The secondary objective was to examine EQ-5D-3L utility scores and VAS scores among survivors using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Primary outcomes regarding QALY gains (+0.0295; P = 0.76) and VAS-AL gains (+0.1332; P = 0.09) in the intervention group were not significant. The overall cost difference was -€2575 (P = 0.30). The probability of cost-effectiveness of the case management at a willingness-to-pay value of €0 per QALY was 84% in the case of QALYs and 81% in the case of VAS-ALs. Secondary outcomes concerning survivors' quality of life were significantly better in the intervention group (EQ-5D-3L utilities: +0.104, P = 0.005; VAS: +8.15, P = 0.001) after 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The case management was cost-neutral and led to an important and significant improvement in health status among survivors. It was associated with higher QALYs and lower costs but the differences in costs and QALYs were not statistically significant.

摘要

目的

从社会角度评估以护士为基础的病例管理干预措施对老年心肌梗死患者的3年成本效益。

方法

干预措施包括第一年进行一次家访和每季度一次电话随访,接下来两年每半年进行一次电话随访。主要效果指标为质量调整生命年(QALY),基于欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-3L)以及根据视觉模拟量表(VAS-AL)由患者自评健康状态得出的调整生命年。采用线性回归模型计算调整生命年,采用伽马模型计算成本。通过成本效益可接受性曲线处理估计的不确定性,该曲线表明在给定支付意愿值下成本效益的可能性。次要目标是使用线性混合模型检查幸存者中的EQ-5D-3L效用得分和VAS得分。

结果

干预组在QALY增益(+0.0295;P = 0.76)和VAS-AL增益(+0.1332;P = 0.09)方面的主要结果不显著。总体成本差异为-2575欧元(P = 0.30)。在每QALY支付意愿值为0欧元的情况下,病例管理具有成本效益的概率在QALY方面为8�%,在VAS-AL方面为81%。3年后,干预组中关于幸存者生活质量的次要结果显著更好(EQ-5D-3L效用:+0.104,P = 0.005;VAS:+8.15,P = 0.001)。

结论

病例管理成本持平,并使幸存者的健康状况得到了重要且显著的改善。它与更高的QALY和更低的成本相关,但成本和QALY的差异无统计学意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索