Shiri Rahman, Nikunlaakso Risto, Laitinen Jaana
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 18, 00032 Helsinki, Finland.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 17;11(12):1792. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121792.
Health and social service workers face high levels of workload and job stressors, which can affect their health and well-being. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of workplace interventions that aim to improve their mental and physical health outcomes. This review summarizes the findings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of different types of workplace interventions on various health indicators among health and social service workers. The review searched the PubMed database from its inception to December 2022 and included RCTs that reported on the effectiveness of organizational-level interventions and qualitative studies that explored barriers and facilitators to participation in such interventions. A total of 108 RCTs were included in the review, covering job burnout (N = 56 RCTs), happiness or job satisfaction (N = 35), sickness absence (N = 18), psychosocial work stressors (N = 14), well-being (N = 13), work ability (N = 12), job performance or work engagement (N = 12), perceived general health (N = 9), and occupational injuries (N = 3). The review found that several workplace interventions were effective in improving work ability, well-being, perceived general health, work performance, and job satisfaction and in reducing psychosocial stressors, burnout, and sickness absence among healthcare workers. However, the effects were generally modest and short-lived. Some of the common barriers to participation in workplace interventions among healthcare workers were inadequate staff, high workload, time pressures, work constraints, lack of manager support, scheduling health programs outside work hours, and lack of motivation. This review suggests that workplace interventions have small short-term positive effects on health and well-being of healthcare workers. Workplace interventions should be implemented as routine programs with free work hours to encourage participation or integrate intervention activities into daily work routines.
卫生和社会服务工作者面临着高强度的工作量和工作压力源,这可能会影响他们的健康和幸福。因此,评估旨在改善他们身心健康状况的工作场所干预措施的有效性非常重要。本综述总结了随机对照试验(RCT)的结果,这些试验研究了不同类型的工作场所干预措施对卫生和社会服务工作者各种健康指标的影响。该综述检索了从成立到2022年12月的PubMed数据库,纳入了报告组织层面干预措施有效性的随机对照试验,以及探索参与此类干预措施的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。该综述共纳入108项随机对照试验,涵盖职业倦怠(N = 56项随机对照试验)、幸福感或工作满意度(N = 35项)、病假(N = 18项)、心理社会工作压力源(N = 14项)、幸福感(N = 13项)、工作能力(N = 12项)、工作绩效或工作投入(N = 12项)、感知总体健康(N = 9项)和职业伤害(N = 3项)。该综述发现,几种工作场所干预措施在提高工作能力、幸福感、感知总体健康、工作绩效和工作满意度以及减少医护人员的心理社会压力源、职业倦怠和病假方面是有效的。然而,这些影响通常较小且持续时间较短。医护人员参与工作场所干预措施的一些常见障碍包括人员不足、工作量大、时间压力、工作限制、缺乏管理人员支持、在工作时间之外安排健康项目以及缺乏动力。本综述表明,工作场所干预措施对医护人员的健康和幸福有微小的短期积极影响。工作场所干预措施应作为具有自由工作时间的常规项目实施,以鼓励参与,或将干预活动融入日常工作流程。