Angelucci Emanuele, Urru Silvana Anna Maria, Pilo Federica, Piperno Alberto
Hematology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova. Italy; Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Ospedale Oncologico di Riferimento Regionale "Armando Businco", Cagliari, Italy.
CRS4, Biomedicine Sector, Scientific and Technology Park of Sardinia, Pula, Cagliari, Italy.
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 1;9(1):e2017021. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2017.021. eCollection 2017.
Over recent decades we have been fortunate to witness the advent of new technologies and of an expanded knowledge and application of chelation therapies to the benefit of patients with iron overload. However, extrapolation of learnings from thalassemia to the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has resulted in a fragmented and uncoordinated clinical evidence base. We're therefore forced to change our understanding of MDS, looking with other eyes to observational studies that inform us about the relationship between iron and tissue damage in these subjects. The available evidence suggests that iron accumulation is prognostically significant in MDS, but levels of accumulation historically associated with organ damage (based on data generated in the thalassemias) are infrequent. Emerging experimental data have provided some insight into this paradox, as our understanding of iron-induced tissue damage has evolved from a process of progressive bulking of organs through high-volumes iron deposition, to one of 'toxic' damage inflicted through multiple cellular pathways. Damage from iron may, therefore, occur prior to reaching reference thresholds, and similarly, chelation may be of benefit before overt iron overload is seen. In this review, we revisit the scientific and clinical evidence for iron overload in MDS to better characterize the iron overload phenotype in these patients, which differs from the classical transfusional and non-transfusional iron overload syndrome. We hope this will provide a conceptual framework to better understand the complex associations between anemia, iron and clinical outcomes, to accelerate progress in this area.
在最近几十年里,我们有幸见证了新技术的出现以及螯合疗法知识的扩展和应用,这造福了铁过载患者。然而,将地中海贫血的经验外推至骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS),导致了临床证据基础零散且缺乏协调。因此,我们不得不改变对MDS的理解,以不同的视角审视观察性研究,这些研究能让我们了解这些患者中铁与组织损伤之间的关系。现有证据表明,铁蓄积在MDS的预后中具有重要意义,但历史上与器官损伤相关的蓄积水平(基于地中海贫血产生的数据)并不常见。随着我们对铁诱导组织损伤的理解从通过大量铁沉积使器官逐渐肿大的过程,演变为通过多种细胞途径造成“毒性”损伤的过程,新出现的实验数据为这一矛盾现象提供了一些见解。因此,铁损伤可能在达到参考阈值之前就已发生,同样,在出现明显的铁过载之前进行螯合治疗可能有益。在本综述中,我们重新审视MDS中铁过载的科学和临床证据,以更好地描述这些患者的铁过载表型,其不同于经典的输血性和非输血性铁过载综合征。我们希望这将提供一个概念框架,以更好地理解贫血、铁与临床结局之间的复杂关联,从而加速该领域的进展。