Suppr超能文献

药物超敏反应的诊断方法:欧洲与北美的异同

Approach to the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: similarities and differences between Europe and North America.

作者信息

Torres M J, Romano A, Celik G, Demoly P, Khan D A, Macy E, Park M, Blumenthal K, Aberer W, Castells M, Barbaud A, Mayorga C, Bonadonna P

机构信息

Allergy Unit, National Network ARADyAL, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA (Pavilion C), Plaza del Hospital Civil, 29009 Malaga, Spain.

BIONAND-Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology, Malaga, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Transl Allergy. 2017 Mar 13;7:7. doi: 10.1186/s13601-017-0144-0. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) affect an unknown proportion of the general population, and are an important public health problem due to their potential to cause life-threatening anaphylaxis and rare severe cutaneous allergic reactions. DHR evaluations are frequently needed in both ambulatory and hospital settings and have a complex diagnosis that requires a detailed clinical history and other tests that may include in vitro tests and in vivo procedures such as skin tests and drug provocation tests. Although over the years both European and U.S. experts have published statements on general procedures for evaluating DHRs, a substantial discordance in their daily management exists. In this review, we highlight both the differences and the similarities between the European and U.S.

PERSPECTIVES

While a general consensus exists on the importance of skin tests for evaluating DHRs, concordance between Americans and Europeans exists solely regarding their use in immediate reactions and the fact that a confirmation of a presumptive diagnosis by drug provocation tests is often the only reliable way to establish a diagnosis. Finally, great heterogeneity exists in the application of in vitro tests, which require further study to be well validated.

摘要

未标注

药物过敏反应(DHRs)在普通人群中的影响比例尚不清楚,由于其有可能引发危及生命的过敏反应和罕见的严重皮肤过敏反应,因此是一个重要的公共卫生问题。在门诊和医院环境中,经常需要进行DHR评估,其诊断复杂,需要详细的临床病史以及其他检查,这些检查可能包括体外试验和体内程序,如皮肤试验和药物激发试验。尽管多年来欧洲和美国的专家都发表了关于评估DHRs的一般程序的声明,但在其日常管理中仍存在很大差异。在本综述中,我们强调了欧洲和美国观点之间的差异和相似之处。

观点

虽然对于皮肤试验在评估DHRs中的重要性存在普遍共识,但美国人和欧洲人仅在其用于速发型反应以及药物激发试验对推定诊断的确认通常是确立诊断的唯一可靠方法这两方面存在一致意见。最后,体外试验的应用存在很大异质性,需要进一步研究以得到充分验证。

相似文献

2
Controversies in drug allergy: In vitro testing.药物过敏争议:体外检测。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jan;143(1):56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
International Consensus on drug allergy.国际药物过敏共识。
Allergy. 2014 Apr;69(4):420-37. doi: 10.1111/all.12350.

引用本文的文献

4
Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in Children.儿童药物性过敏反应
Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 27;12(3):527. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030527.
5
Approach for delabeling beta-lactam allergy in children.儿童β-内酰胺类药物过敏标签去除方法。
Front Allergy. 2023 Nov 15;4:1298335. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1298335. eCollection 2023.
6
Resensitization in suspected penicillin allergy.疑似青霉素过敏的再致敏。
Allergy. 2023 Jan;78(1):214-224. doi: 10.1111/all.15508. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
The Role of Benzylpenicilloyl Epimers in Specific IgE Recognition.苄青霉素酰差向异构体在特异性IgE识别中的作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Feb 26;12:585890. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.585890. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotics Are the Most Commonly Identified Cause of Perioperative Hypersensitivity Reactions.抗生素是围手术期过敏反应最常见的确定病因。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;4(4):697-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
4
Anaphylaxis--a practice parameter update 2015.过敏反应——2015年实践参数更新
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Nov;115(5):341-84. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.07.019.
8
Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter-update 2015.接触性皮炎:实践参数更新 2015 年版。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3 Suppl):S1-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.02.009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验