Harvey Erin M, Twelker J Daniel, Miller Joseph M, Leonard-Green Tina K, Mohan Kathleen M, Davis Amy L, Campus Irene
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; College of Optical Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:6460281. doi: 10.1155/2017/6460281. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
. To determine if spectacle corrected and uncorrected astigmats show reduced performance on visual motor and perceptual tasks. . Third through 8th grade students were assigned to the low refractive error control group (astigmatism < 1.00 D, myopia < 0.75 D, hyperopia < 2.50 D, and anisometropia < 1.50 D) or bilateral astigmatism group (right and left eye ≥ 1.00 D) based on cycloplegic refraction. Students completed the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration (VMI) and Visual Perception (VMIp). Astigmats were randomly assigned to testing with/without correction and control group was tested uncorrected. Analyses compared VMI and VMIp scores for corrected and uncorrected astigmats to the control group. . The sample included 333 students (control group 170, astigmats tested with correction 75, and astigmats tested uncorrected 88). Mean VMI score in corrected astigmats did not differ from the control group ( = 0.829). Uncorrected astigmats had lower VMI scores than the control group ( = 0.038) and corrected astigmats ( = 0.007). Mean VMIp scores for uncorrected ( = 0.209) and corrected astigmats ( = 0.124) did not differ from the control group. Uncorrected astigmats had lower mean scores than the corrected astigmats ( = 0.003). . Uncorrected astigmatism influences visual motor and perceptual task performance. Previously spectacle treated astigmats do not show developmental deficits on visual motor or perceptual tasks when tested with correction.
确定经眼镜矫正和未经矫正的散光患者在视觉运动和感知任务上是否表现出能力下降。根据睫状肌麻痹验光结果，将三年级至八年级学生分为低屈光不正对照组（散光<1.00 D、近视<0.75 D、远视<2.50 D和屈光参差<1.50 D）或双侧散光组（右眼和左眼≥1.00 D）。学生们完成了贝利-布克滕尼卡视觉运动整合发育测试（VMI）和视觉感知测试（VMIp）。散光患者被随机分配进行矫正/不矫正测试，对照组进行未矫正测试。分析比较了矫正和未矫正散光患者与对照组的VMI和VMIp分数。该样本包括333名学生（对照组170名、矫正后测试的散光患者75名、未矫正测试的散光患者88名）。矫正后散光患者的平均VMI分数与对照组无差异（P = 0.829）。未矫正的散光患者VMI分数低于对照组（P = 0.038）和矫正后的散光患者（P = 0.007）。未矫正（P = 0.209）和矫正后散光患者的平均VMIp分数与对照组无差异。未矫正的散光患者平均分数低于矫正后的散光患者（P = 0.003）。未矫正的散光会影响视觉运动和感知任务表现。以前接受眼镜治疗的散光患者在矫正测试时，在视觉运动或感知任务上未表现出发育缺陷。
