Suppr超能文献

用于妇科肿瘤患者术后疼痛管理的连续伤口浸润系统

Continuous wound infiltration system for postoperative pain management in gynecologic oncology patients.

作者信息

Lee Banghyun, Kim Kidong, Ahn Soyeon, Shin Hyun-Jung, Suh Dong Hoon, No Jae Hong, Kim Yong Beom

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hallym University Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1219-1226. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4342-8. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Major open surgery for gynecologic cancer usually involves a long midline skin incision and induces severe postoperative surgical site pain (POSP) that may not be effectively controlled with the conventional management. We investigated whether combining a continuous wound infiltration system (CWIS, ON-Q PainBuster) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) effectively decreases POSP, compared with IV PCA alone, in gynecologic oncology patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 62 Korean patients who received a long midline skin incision during gynecologic cancer surgery. The combined therapy group (n = 31), which received CWIS (0.5% ropivacaine infused over 72 h) and IV PCA (fentanyl citrate), and the IV PCA only group (n = 31) were determined using 1:1 matching. POSP was assessed using resting numeric rating scale (NRS) scores measured for 96 h after surgery, which were analyzed using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

The slopes of the predicted NRS values from the linear mixed model were significantly different between the groups. Compared with the control group, the combined therapy group had lower predicted NRS scores for the first 72 h, but higher predicted scores between 72 and 96 h. Moreover, the mean NRS scores over the first 48 h postoperation were significantly lower in the combined therapy group than in the control group; the scores were similar in both groups during the remaining period. With the exception of a higher body mass index in the CWIS group, the other variables, such as the dosage and usage time of fentanyl citrate, use of additional painkillers, and side effects, including wound complications, did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy using CWIS and IV PCA may be a useful strategy for POSP management in gynecologic oncology patients.

摘要

目的

妇科癌症的大型开放性手术通常需要做一条较长的中线皮肤切口,术后会引发严重的手术部位疼痛(POSP),而传统的处理方法可能无法有效控制这种疼痛。我们研究了在妇科肿瘤患者中,与单纯静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)相比,联合使用连续伤口浸润系统(CWIS,ON-Q PainBuster)和IV PCA是否能有效减轻POSP。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了62例在妇科癌症手术期间接受了较长中线皮肤切口的韩国患者。联合治疗组(n = 31)接受了CWIS(0.5%罗哌卡因持续输注72小时)和IV PCA(枸橼酸芬太尼),单纯IV PCA组(n = 31)通过1:1匹配确定。使用术后96小时测量的静息数字评分量表(NRS)分数评估POSP,并采用线性混合模型进行分析。

结果

线性混合模型预测的NRS值斜率在两组之间存在显著差异。与对照组相比,联合治疗组在最初72小时的预测NRS分数较低,但在72至96小时之间较高。此外,联合治疗组术后前48小时的平均NRS分数显著低于对照组;在其余时间段两组分数相似。除了CWIS组的体重指数较高外,其他变量,如枸橼酸芬太尼的剂量和使用时间、额外止痛药的使用以及包括伤口并发症在内的副作用,两组之间没有差异。

结论

联合使用CWIS和IV PCA可能是管理妇科肿瘤患者POSP的一种有用策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验