• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏再同步治疗超反应者的预测因素及长期预后

Predictors and long-term outcome of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

作者信息

Ghani Abdul, Delnoy Peter Paul H M, Adiyaman Ahmet, Ottervanger Jan Paul, Ramdat Misier Anand R, Smit Jaap Jan J, Elvan Arif

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Isala Heart Centre, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2017 May;40(5):292-299. doi: 10.1002/clc.22658. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1002/clc.22658
PMID:28294364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6490391/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The level of improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is exceptional. However, the long-term prognosis remains unknown in a large population.

HYPOTHESIS

Whether super-responders haven good long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We registered 347 patients with primary CRT-D indication. Super-response was defined by LVEF >50% at follow-up echocardiogram. Best-subset regression analysis identified predictors of super-response. Endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; eg, all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization, cardiac death, and appropriate ICD therapy).

RESULTS

Fifty-six (16%) patients with LVEF >50% were classified as super-responders. Female sex (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.54-6.05), nonischemic etiology (OR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.29-5.68), higher LVEF at baseline (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), and wider QRS duration (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32) were predictors of super-response. Cumulative incidence of MACE at a median of 5.3 years was 18% in super-responders, 22% in responders, and 51% in nonresponders (P < 0.001). None of super responders died from cardiac death, compared to 9% of responders and 25% of non-responders (P < 0.001). None of super-responders experienced appropriate ICD therapy, compared with 10% of responders and 21% of non-responders (P < 0.001). In super-responders, the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.19-0.73) for MACE and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.20-0.95) for total mortality, compared with non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex, non-ischemic etiology, higher baseline LVEF, and wider QRS duration were independently associated with super-response. Super-response was associated with persistent excellent prognosis regarding survival and appropriate ICD therapy during long-term follow-up.

摘要

背景

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的超反应者左心室射血分数(LVEF)的改善程度异常显著。然而,大量人群的长期预后仍不清楚。

假设

超反应者是否具有良好的长期预后。

方法

我们登记了347例原发性CRT-D适应症患者。超反应定义为随访超声心动图时LVEF>50%。最佳子集回归分析确定了超反应的预测因素。终点为主要不良心脏事件(MACE;如全因死亡率或心力衰竭住院、心源性死亡和适当的ICD治疗)。

结果

56例(16%)LVEF>50%的患者被归类为超反应者。女性(OR:3.06,95%CI:1.54-6.05)、非缺血性病因(OR:2.70,95%CI:1.29-5.68)、基线时较高的LVEF(OR:1.07,95%CI:1.02-1.13)和较宽的QRS时限(OR:1.17,95%CI:1.04-1.32)是超反应的预测因素。超反应者中位随访5.3年时MACE的累积发生率为18%,反应者为22%,无反应者为51%(P<0.001)。超反应者无一例死于心源性死亡,而反应者为9%,无反应者为25%(P<0.001)。超反应者无一例接受适当的ICD治疗,而反应者为10%,无反应者为21%(P<0.001)。与无反应者相比,超反应者MACE的调整后风险比为0.37(95%CI:0.19-0.73),总死亡率的调整后风险比为0.44(95%CI:0.20-0.95)。

结论

女性、非缺血性病因、较高的基线LVEF和较宽的QRS时限与超反应独立相关。超反应与长期随访期间生存和适当ICD治疗方面持续良好的预后相关。

相似文献

1
Predictors and long-term outcome of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗超反应者的预测因素及长期预后
Clin Cardiol. 2017 May;40(5):292-299. doi: 10.1002/clc.22658. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
2
Long-term outcome of patients with and without super-response to CRT-D.有或没有对心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)产生超反应的患者的长期预后
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Apr;105(4):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0926-0. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
Cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with a reduction in ICD therapies as it improves ventricular function.心脏再同步治疗与植入式心律转复除颤器治疗次数的减少相关,因为它能改善心室功能。
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jun;41(6):803-808. doi: 10.1002/clc.22958. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and associated improvement in clinical outcome: the MADIT-CRT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy) study.心脏再同步治疗超级反应的预测因素及其对临床结局的改善:MADIT-CRT(心脏再同步治疗的多中心自动除颤器植入试验)研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 19;59(25):2366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.065.
5
Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的长期预后的性别差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(7):e002013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002013.
6
Adding the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with improved long-term survival in ischaemic, but not in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.在心脏再同步治疗中添加植入式心脏复律除颤器与缺血性心肌病患者的长期生存率提高相关,但与非缺血性心肌病患者无关。
Europace. 2016 Mar;18(3):413-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv212. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
7
Reduced long-term overall mortality in heart failure patients with prolonged QRS treated with CRT combined with ICD vs. heart failure patients with narrow QRS treated with ICD only.与仅接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的窄QRS波心力衰竭患者相比,接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)联合ICD治疗的宽QRS波心力衰竭患者长期总体死亡率降低。
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1374-82. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv347. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
Complete left bundle branch block and smaller left atrium are predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure.完全性左束支传导阻滞和较小的左心房是晚期心力衰竭患者对心脏再同步治疗反应的预测指标。
Circ J. 2015;79(11):2414-21. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0769. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
9
Renal function impairment predicts mortality in patients with chronic heart failure treated with resynchronization therapy.肾功能损害可预测接受心脏再同步治疗的慢性心力衰竭患者的死亡率。
Cardiol J. 2015;22(4):459-66. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2015.0019.
10
Left ventricular ejection fraction normalization in cardiac resynchronization therapy and risk of ventricular arrhythmias and clinical outcomes: results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial.心脏再同步治疗中左心室射血分数的正常化与室性心律失常和临床结局的风险:来自多中心自动除颤器植入试验与心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)试验的结果。
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):2278-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011283. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of DCM-Causing Genetic Background on Long-Term Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.致心律失常性右室心肌病相关基因突变背景对心脏再同步化治疗长期反应的影响。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;10(7 Pt 1):1455-1464. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.03.019. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Follow-up of CRT-D patients downgraded to CRT-P at the time of generator exchange.在发生器更换时降级为心脏再同步治疗-起搏器(CRT-P)的心脏再同步治疗-除颤器(CRT-D)患者的随访
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 15;10:1217523. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217523. eCollection 2023.
3
A machine learning method integrating ECG and gated SPECT for cardiac resynchronization therapy decision support.一种结合心电图和门控 SPECT 的机器学习方法,用于心脏再同步治疗决策支持。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Aug;50(10):3022-3033. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06259-4. Epub 2023 May 17.
4
Sex, Race, and Age Differences of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy RCTs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.心脏再同步治疗随机对照试验中心血管结局的性别、种族和年龄差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
CJC Open. 2021 Sep 15;3(12 Suppl):S192-S201. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.005. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy use in New Zealand (ANZACS-QI 33).新西兰植入式心脏复律除颤器及心脏再同步治疗的应用(ANZACS-QI 33)
J Arrhythm. 2019 Oct 6;36(1):153-163. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12244. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Heart Failure Duration Combined with Left Atrial Dimension Predicts Super-Response and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantation.心力衰竭持续时间与左心房内径联合预测心脏再同步治疗植入患者的超强反应和长期预后。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jun 24;2019:2983752. doi: 10.1155/2019/2983752. eCollection 2019.
7
Does 'super-responder' patients to cardiac resynchronization therapy still have indications for neuro-hormonal antagonists? Evidence from long-term follow-up in a single center.心脏再同步治疗的“超级反应者”患者是否仍有使用神经激素拮抗剂的指征?来自单中心长期随访的证据。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Mar;16(3):251-258. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.03.015.
8
Mid-term feasibility and safety of downgrade procedure from defibrillator to pacemaker with cardiac resynchronization therapy.从除颤器降级至心脏再同步治疗起搏器的中期可行性及安全性
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2018 Dec 29;22:78-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.12.012. eCollection 2019 Mar.
9
Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is unrelated to medical therapy.非缺血性心肌病患者对心脏再同步治疗的反应与药物治疗无关。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Jan;42(1):143-150. doi: 10.1002/clc.23123. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
10
Protein Phosphatase Inhibitor-1 Gene Therapy in a Swine Model of Nonischemic Heart Failure.蛋白磷酸酶抑制剂-1基因治疗在非缺血性心力衰竭猪模型中的应用
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 3;70(14):1744-1756. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.013.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Role of Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.右心室功能在接受心脏再同步治疗的心力衰竭患者中的预后作用
Clin Cardiol. 2016 Nov;39(11):640-645. doi: 10.1002/clc.22574. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
Reduced appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy after cardiac resynchronization therapy-induced left ventricular function recovery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.心脏再同步治疗诱导左心室功能恢复后,合适的植入式心律转复除颤器治疗减少:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 1;36(41):2780-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv373. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
3
Super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy remain at risk for ventricular arrhythmias and benefit from defibrillator treatment.心脏再同步治疗的超级应答者仍然存在室性心律失常的风险,并受益于除颤器治疗。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;16(10):1104-11. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.152. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
4
Predictors and outcomes of "super-response" to cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗“超反应”的预测因素及结果
J Card Fail. 2014 Jun;20(6):379-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
5
Left ventricular ejection fraction overcrossing 35% after one year of cardiac resynchronization therapy predicts long term survival and freedom from sudden cardiac death: single center observational experience.心脏再同步治疗一年后左心室射血分数超过 35%预测长期生存和免于心源性猝死:单中心观察经验。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Mar 1;172(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
6
Durability of the survival effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy by level of left ventricular functional improvement: fate of "nonresponders".心脏再同步治疗生存效应的持久性与左心室功能改善程度:“无反应者”的转归
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.025. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
7
Long-term outcome of 'super-responder' patients to cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗“超级应答者”患者的长期预后。
Europace. 2014 Mar;16(3):363-71. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut339. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
8
Normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac resynchronization therapy also normalizes survival.心脏再同步治疗后左心室射血分数的正常化也使生存率正常化。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;36(8):970-7. doi: 10.1111/pace.12174. Epub 2013 May 29.
9
Long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study.心脏再同步治疗对轻度心力衰竭的长期影响:来自左心室收缩功能障碍再同步治疗逆转重构(REVERSE)研究的 5 年结果。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Sep;34(33):2592-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht160. Epub 2013 May 2.
10
Functional response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with improved clinical outcome and absence of appropriate shocks.对心脏再同步治疗的功能反应与改善的临床结果和无适当电击有关。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):316-22. doi: 10.1111/jce.12037. Epub 2012 Dec 4.