• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表面清洁与消毒:四种氯制剂对大肠杆菌和埃博拉病毒替代株 Phi6 的杀灭效果评估。

Surface Cleaning and Disinfection: Efficacy Assessment of Four Chlorine Types Using Escherichia coli and the Ebola Surrogate Phi6.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University , Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Apr 18;51(8):4624-4631. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06014. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.6b06014
PMID:28294602
Abstract

In the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak, international organizations provided conflicting recommendations for disinfecting surfaces contaminated by uncontrolled patient spills. We compared the efficacy of four chlorine solutions (sodium hypochlorite, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, high-test hypochlorite, and generated hypochlorite) for disinfection of three surface types (stainless steel, heavy-duty tarp, and nitrile) with and without pre-cleaning practices (prewiping, covering, or both) and soil load. The test organisms were Escherichia coli and the Ebola surrogate Phi6. All tests achieved a minimum of 5.9 and 3.1 log removal in E. coli and Phi6, respectively. A 15 min exposure to 0.5% chlorine was sufficient to ensure <8 Phi6 plaque-forming unit (PFU)/cm in all tests. While chlorine types were equally efficacious with and without soil load, variation was seen by surface type. Wiping did not increase disinfection efficacy and is not recommended because it generates infectious waste. Covering spills decreased disinfection efficacy against E. coli on heavy-duty tarp but does prevent splashing, which is critical in Ebola contexts. Our results support the recommendation of a 15 min exposure to 0.5% chlorine, independently of chlorine type, surface, pre-cleaning practices, and organic matter, as an efficacious measure to interrupt disease transmission from uncontrolled spills in Ebola outbreaks.

摘要

在 2014 年西非埃博拉疫情中,国际组织对受不受控制的患者溢出物污染的表面进行消毒提出了相互矛盾的建议。我们比较了四种含氯溶液(次氯酸钠、二氯异氰尿酸钠、高测试次氯酸钠和生成次氯酸钠)对三种表面类型(不锈钢、重型防水布和丁腈橡胶)的消毒效果,有无预清洁(预擦拭、覆盖或两者兼有)和土壤负荷。测试生物是大肠杆菌和埃博拉病毒替代株 Phi6。所有测试均使大肠杆菌和 Phi6 的去除率分别达到了至少 5.9 和 3.1 个对数。在 0.5%的氯暴露 15 分钟即可确保所有测试中 Phi6 的噬菌斑形成单位(PFU)/cm 小于 8。虽然含氯类型在有或没有土壤负荷的情况下同样有效,但因表面类型而有所差异。擦拭不会增加消毒效果,因此不建议使用,因为它会产生感染性废物。在重型防水布上覆盖溢出物会降低对大肠杆菌的消毒效果,但可防止飞溅,这在埃博拉疫情中至关重要。我们的研究结果支持建议使用 15 分钟暴露于 0.5%的氯,而不受氯类型、表面、预清洁实践和有机物的影响,作为一种有效的措施,可以从埃博拉疫情中的不受控制的溢出物中断疾病传播。

相似文献

1
Surface Cleaning and Disinfection: Efficacy Assessment of Four Chlorine Types Using Escherichia coli and the Ebola Surrogate Phi6.表面清洁与消毒:四种氯制剂对大肠杆菌和埃博拉病毒替代株 Phi6 的杀灭效果评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Apr 18;51(8):4624-4631. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06014. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
2
Handwashing and Ebola virus disease outbreaks: A randomized comparison of soap, hand sanitizer, and 0.05% chlorine solutions on the inactivation and removal of model organisms Phi6 and E. coli from hands and persistence in rinse water.洗手与埃博拉病毒病疫情:肥皂、洗手液和0.05%氯溶液对手上模型生物Phi6和大肠杆菌的灭活、去除及在冲洗水中残留的随机比较
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0172734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172734. eCollection 2017.
3
Selection of a Biosafety Level 1 (BSL-1) surrogate to evaluate surface disinfection efficacy in Ebola outbreaks: Comparison of four bacteriophages.选择生物安全1级(BSL-1)替代物以评估埃博拉疫情中的表面消毒效果:四种噬菌体的比较
PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0177943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177943. eCollection 2017.
4
Disinfection of Phi6, MS2, and Escherichia coli by Natural Sunlight on Healthcare Critical Surfaces.自然光照下医疗关键表面 Phi6、MS2 和大肠杆菌的消毒。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Jun 5;109(1):182-190. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0464. Print 2023 Jul 5.
5
Chlorine efficacy against bacteriophage Phi6, a surrogate for enveloped human viruses, on porous and non-porous surfaces at varying temperatures and humidity.在不同温度和湿度条件下,氯对噬菌体Phi6(一种包膜人类病毒的替代物)在多孔和无孔表面上的杀菌效果。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2022;57(8):685-693. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2022.2101845. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
Accuracy, Precision, Ease-Of-Use, and Cost of Methods to Test Ebola-Relevant Chlorine Solutions.检测与埃博拉相关的氯溶液的方法的准确性、精密度、易用性及成本
PLoS One. 2016 May 31;11(5):e0152442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152442. eCollection 2016.
7
Shelf-Life of Chlorine Solutions Recommended in Ebola Virus Disease Response.埃博拉病毒病应对中推荐的氯溶液保质期。
PLoS One. 2016 May 31;11(5):e0156136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156136. eCollection 2016.
8
A systematic review of chlorine-based surface disinfection efficacy to inform recommendations for low-resource outbreak settings.基于氯的表面消毒效果的系统评价,为资源匮乏的暴发环境下的推荐意见提供信息。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):90-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
[Comparison of the effects of chlorine dioxide, sodium hypochlorite and their combination on simulative water disinfection].[二氧化氯、次氯酸钠及其组合对模拟水消毒效果的比较]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2008 May;37(3):285-9.
10
The effectiveness of two disinfectants on denture base acrylic resin with an organic load.两种消毒剂对带有有机负荷的义齿基托丙烯酸树脂的有效性。
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 May;61(5):580-3. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90280-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the survival and removal of from surfaces made with traditional and sustainable cement-based materials in field-relevant conditions.在与实际应用场景相关的条件下,评估[具体物质]在由传统和可持续水泥基材料制成的表面上的存活和去除情况。 需注意,原文中“Evaluating the survival and removal of from...”部分有缺失信息,这里补充了“[具体物质]”以使译文更完整通顺。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025 Apr 23;91(4):e0213124. doi: 10.1128/aem.02131-24. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
2
Disinfection of Phi6, MS2, and Escherichia coli by Natural Sunlight on Healthcare Critical Surfaces.自然光照下医疗关键表面 Phi6、MS2 和大肠杆菌的消毒。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Jun 5;109(1):182-190. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0464. Print 2023 Jul 5.
3
Wastewater monitoring in tourist cities as potential sentinel sites for near real-time dynamics of imported SARS-CoV-2 variants.
旅游城市的污水监测作为实时动态监测输入性 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的潜在哨点。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 20;860:160317. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160317. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
4
The effect of hydrochloric acid and sodium hypochlorite on fracture resistance of orthodontic self-cure acrylic base.盐酸和次氯酸钠对正畸自凝丙烯酸基托抗折性能的影响
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Sep 26;19:74. eCollection 2022.
5
Sanitizing agents for virus inactivation and disinfection.用于病毒灭活和消毒的消毒剂。
View (Beijing). 2020 Jun;1(2):e16. doi: 10.1002/viw2.16. Epub 2020 May 24.
6
Back to Basics: Choosing the Appropriate Surface Disinfectant.回归基础:选择合适的表面消毒剂。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 May 21;10(6):613. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060613.
7
Fomite Transmission, Physicochemical Origin of Virus-Surface Interactions, and Disinfection Strategies for Enveloped Viruses with Applications to SARS-CoV-2.飞沫传播、病毒-表面相互作用的物理化学起源以及包膜病毒的消毒策略及其在SARS-CoV-2中的应用
ACS Omega. 2021 Mar 5;6(10):6509-6527. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06335. eCollection 2021 Mar 16.
8
Disinfectants In Interventional Practices.介入实践中的消毒剂。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2021 Mar 11;25(4):21. doi: 10.1007/s11916-021-00938-3.
9
Sewer biofilm microbiome and antibiotic resistance genes as function of pipe material, source of microbes, and disinfection: field and laboratory studies.下水道生物膜微生物群落和抗生素抗性基因与管道材料、微生物来源及消毒的关系:现场和实验室研究
Environ Sci (Camb). 2020 Aug 1;6(8):2122-2137. doi: 10.1039/d0ew00265h. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
10
Disinfection technology and strategies for COVID-19 hospital and bio-medical waste management.新冠疫情期间医院和生物医学废物管理的消毒技术和策略。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 20;749:141652. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141652. Epub 2020 Aug 12.