Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Hepatology. 2017 Aug;66(2):646-654. doi: 10.1002/hep.29152. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
Drug-induced hepatocellular injury is identified internationally by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels equal to or exceeding 5× the upper limit of normal (ULN) appearing within 3 months of drug initiation, after alternative causes are excluded. Upon withdrawing the suspect drug, ALT generally decrease by 50% or more. With drug readministration, a positive rechallenge has recently been defined by an ALT level of 3-5× ULN or greater. Nearly 50 drugs are associated with positive rechallenge after drug-induced liver injury (DILI): antimicrobials; and central nervous system, cardiovascular and oncology therapeutics. Drugs associated with high rates of positive rechallenge exhibit multiple risk factors: daily dose >50 mg, an increased incidence of ALT elevations in clinical trials, immunoallergic clinical injury, and mitochondrial impairment in vitro. These drug factors interact with personal genetic, immune, and metabolic factors to influence positive rechallenge rates and outcomes. Drug rechallenge following drug-induced liver injury is associated with up to 13% mortality in prospective series of all prescribed drugs. In recent oncology trials, standardized systems have enabled safer drug rechallenge with weekly liver chemistry monitoring during the high-risk period and exclusion of patients with hypersensitivity. However, high positive rechallenge rates with other innovative therapeutics suggest that caution should be taken with rechallenge of high-risk drugs.
For critical medicines, drug rechallenge may be appropriate when 1) no safer alternatives are available, 2) the objective benefit exceeds the risk, and 3) patients are fully informed and consent, can adhere to follow-up, and alert providers to hepatitis symptoms. To better understand rechallenge outcomes and identify key risk factors for positive rechallenge, additional data are needed from controlled clinical trials, prospective registries, and large health care databases. (Hepatology 2017;66:646-654).
国际上通过排除其他原因后,在药物开始使用后 3 个月内出现的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)水平等于或超过正常值上限的 5 倍,来确定药物引起的肝细胞损伤。在停用可疑药物后,ALT 通常会降低 50%或更多。最近,重新给予药物时,ALT 水平达到 3-5 倍 ULN 或更高,被定义为阳性再挑战。近 50 种药物与药物性肝损伤(DILI)后的阳性再挑战有关:抗生素;中枢神经系统、心血管和肿瘤治疗药物。与高阳性再挑战率相关的药物具有多个危险因素:日剂量>50mg,临床试验中 ALT 升高的发生率增加,免疫过敏临床损伤和体外线粒体损伤。这些药物因素与个人遗传、免疫和代谢因素相互作用,影响阳性再挑战率和结果。在所有处方药物的前瞻性系列中,药物性肝损伤后药物再挑战与高达 13%的死亡率相关。在最近的肿瘤试验中,标准化系统通过在高风险期间每周进行肝化学监测和排除过敏患者,使药物再挑战更安全。然而,其他创新治疗方法的高阳性再挑战率表明,对于高风险药物,应谨慎进行再挑战。
对于关键药物,当 1)没有更安全的替代药物,2)客观获益超过风险,3)患者充分知情并同意、能够坚持随访并提醒医生注意肝炎症状时,药物再挑战可能是合适的。为了更好地了解再挑战结果并确定阳性再挑战的关键危险因素,需要从对照临床试验、前瞻性登记处和大型医疗保健数据库中获得更多数据。(《肝脏病学》2017;66:646-654)。