• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入第二个自膨式瓣膜治疗残余严重主动脉瓣反流的结果

Outcome of implantation of a second self-expanding valve for the treatment of residual significant aortic regurgitation.

作者信息

Koifman Edward, Patel Nirav, Weissman Gaby, Kiramijyan Sarkis, Didier Romain, Torguson Rebecca, Kumar Sandeep, Tavil-Shatelyan Arpi, Ben-Dor Itsik, Satler Lowell F, Pichard Augusto D, Waksman Ron

机构信息

Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):673-679. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26960. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.26960
PMID:28296039
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Residual aortic regurgitation (AR) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with adverse outcome. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second CoreValve (CV) implantation to treat residual AR following the initial CV deployment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TAVR patients treated with a second CV due to moderate and above residual AR were compared to single device implantation. Valvular function parameters were compared at baseline, post procedure, and 30 days. Among 172 CV TAVR patients, 11 required a second device (6%) due to significant residual AR. The main differences between the groups were higher rates of low ejection fraction in patients with 2 CV implanted and higher annular diameter (27 [29-25] vs. 25 [26-24] mm, P = 0.03), requiring a larger device. Although two patients in the two CV group had high initial implantation, low implantation was similar between the groups. A second CV achieved adequate reduction in residual AR in six patients (55%), while an additional four patients had moderate residual AR. Only one remained with moderate to severe AR after 30 days follow-up. There were no cases of peri-procedural stroke or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Second implantation of self-expanding valve can successfully reduce residual significant AR following initial CV implantation and should be considered as therapeutic option for this population. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后残留主动脉瓣反流(AR)与不良预后相关。我们旨在评估二次植入CoreValve(CV)治疗初次植入CV后残留AR的疗效和安全性。

方法和结果

将因中度及以上残留AR而接受二次CV植入的TAVR患者与单次装置植入患者进行比较。在基线、术后和30天时比较瓣膜功能参数。在172例CV TAVR患者中,11例(6%)因显著残留AR需要二次装置。两组之间的主要差异在于,植入2个CV的患者中低射血分数发生率较高,且瓣环直径较大(27[29 - 25]mm对25[26 - 24]mm,P = 0.03),需要更大的装置。虽然两组中有2例患者初始植入高度较高,但两组间低植入情况相似。二次植入CV使6例患者(55%)的残留AR得到充分降低,另有4例患者有中度残留AR。30天随访后仅1例仍有中度至重度AR。围手术期无卒中或死亡病例。

结论

自膨胀瓣膜的二次植入可成功降低初次植入CV后残留的显著AR,应被视为该人群的治疗选择。©2017威利期刊公司。

相似文献

1
Outcome of implantation of a second self-expanding valve for the treatment of residual significant aortic regurgitation.植入第二个自膨式瓣膜治疗残余严重主动脉瓣反流的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):673-679. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26960. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
2
Balloon Post-Dilation Following Implantation of a Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis.球囊后扩张术在自膨式经导管主动脉瓣生物瓣植入术后的应用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 23;10(2):168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.002.
3
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.高危手术患者中经导管主动脉瓣自膨胀置换术与外科瓣膜置换术的比较:一项关于超声心动图变化及风险预测的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003426.
4
1-Year Results in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Failed Surgical Bioprostheses.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗失败的外科生物瓣患者的 1 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 22;10(10):1034-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.018.
5
Valvular performance and aortic regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement using Edwards valve versus CoreValve for severe aortic stenosis: A Meta-analysis.使用爱德华兹瓣膜与CoreValve经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄后的瓣膜性能和主动脉瓣反流:一项荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Jun;17(4):248-55. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Impact of valvular resistance on aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement according to the type of prosthesis.根据假体类型评估瓣周漏对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后主动脉瓣反流的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Dec;108(12):1343-1353. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01469-z. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
7
Outcomes of Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the Treatment of Postprocedural and Late Occurrence of Paravalvular Regurgitation and Transcatheter Valve Failure.再次经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗术后及晚期发生的瓣周反流和经导管瓣膜功能障碍的结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003930.
8
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation is more successful with the Edwards Sapien 3 compared with the Edwards XT for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.经股主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄时,爱德华兹·萨皮恩 3 号瓣比爱德华兹 XT 瓣更成功。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Aug-Sep;111(8-9):470-479. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Quantitative Prediction of Paravalvular Leak in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Based on Tissue-Mimicking 3D Printing.基于组织模拟 3D 打印的经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣周漏的定量预测。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jul;10(7):719-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.005.
10
Intraprocedural valve-in-valve deployment for treatment of aortic regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An individualized approach.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣中瓣技术治疗主动脉瓣反流:个体化方法。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 May 15;283:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.12.079. Epub 2019 Jan 2.