Miller Mark S, Lay Wesley K, Li Shuxiang, Hacker William C, An Jiadi, Ren Jianlan, Elcock Adrian H
Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Apr 11;13(4):1812-1826. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01059. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
There is a small, but growing, body of literature describing the use of osmotic coefficient measurements to validate and reparametrize simulation force fields. Here we have investigated the ability of five very commonly used force field and water model combinations to reproduce the osmotic coefficients of seven neutral amino acids and five small molecules. The force fields tested include AMBER ff99SB-ILDN, CHARMM36, GROMOS54a7, and OPLS-AA, with the first of these tested in conjunction with the TIP3P and TIP4P-Ew water models. In general, for both the amino acids and the small molecules, the tested force fields produce computed osmotic coefficients that are lower than experiment; this is indicative of excessively favorable solute-solute interactions. The sole exception to this general trend is provided by GROMOS54a7 when applied to amino acids: in this case, the computed osmotic coefficients are consistently too high. Importantly, we show that all of the force fields tested can be made to accurately reproduce the experimental osmotic coefficients of the amino acids when minor modifications-some previously reported by others and some that are new to this study-are made to the van der Waals interactions of the charged terminal groups. Special care is required, however, when simulating Proline with a number of the force fields, and a hydroxyl-group specific modification is required in order to correct Serine and Threonine when simulated with AMBER ff99SB-ILDN. Interestingly, an alternative parametrization of the van der Waals interactions in the latter force field, proposed by the Nerenberg and Head-Gordon groups, is shown to immediately produce osmotic coefficients that are in excellent agreement with experiment. Overall, this study reinforces the idea that osmotic coefficient measurements can be used to identify general shortcomings in commonly used force fields' descriptions of solute-solute interactions and further demonstrates that modifications to van der Waals parameters provide a simple route to optimizing agreement with experiment.
有一小部分但数量在不断增加的文献描述了利用渗透系数测量来验证和重新参数化模拟力场。在此,我们研究了五种非常常用的力场与水模型组合再现七种中性氨基酸和五种小分子渗透系数的能力。所测试的力场包括AMBER ff99SB - ILDN、CHARMM36、GROMOS54a7和OPLS - AA,其中第一种与TIP3P和TIP4P - Ew水模型结合进行测试。总体而言,对于氨基酸和小分子,所测试的力场计算出的渗透系数均低于实验值;这表明溶质 - 溶质相互作用过于有利。这一总体趋势的唯一例外是GROMOS54a7应用于氨基酸时:在这种情况下,计算出的渗透系数始终过高。重要的是,我们表明,当对带电端基的范德华相互作用进行一些小的修改(一些是其他人先前报道的,一些是本研究新提出的)时,所有测试的力场都能准确再现氨基酸的实验渗透系数。然而,在用一些力场模拟脯氨酸时需要特别小心,在用AMBER ff99SB - ILDN模拟丝氨酸和苏氨酸时需要进行特定的羟基基团修改以进行校正。有趣的是,由内伦贝格和黑德 - 戈登团队提出的后一种力场中范德华相互作用的替代参数化方法,立即产生了与实验结果非常吻合的渗透系数。总体而言,本研究强化了这样一种观点,即渗透系数测量可用于识别常用力场在溶质 - 溶质相互作用描述方面的一般缺陷,并进一步证明对范德华参数的修改为优化与实验的一致性提供了一条简单途径。