Yanagawa Masahiro, Johkoh Takeshi, Noguchi Masayuki, Morii Eiichi, Shintani Yasushi, Okumura Meinoshin, Hata Akinori, Fujiwara Maki, Honda Osamu, Tomiyama Noriyuki
Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka Department of Radiology, Kinki Central Hospital of Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Itami, Hyogo Department of Diagnostic Pathology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Department of Pathology Department of Respiratory Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(11):e6331. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006331.
To evaluate thin-section computed tomography (CT) (TSCT) features that differentiate adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IVA), and to determine the size of solid portion on CT that correlates to pathological invasive components. Forty-eight patients were included. Nodules were classified into ground-glass nodule (GGN), part-solid, solid, and heterogeneous. Visual density of GGNs was subjectively evaluated using reference standard images: faint GGN (Ga), <-700 Hounsfield unit (HU); intermediate GGN (Gb), from -700 to -400 HU; dense GGN (Gc), >-400 HU; and mixed (Ga + Gb, Ga + Gc, and Gb + Gc). The evaluated TSCT findings included margin of nodule, distribution of solid portion, distribution of air bronchiologram, and pleural indentation. The longest diameters of the solid portion and the entire tumor were measured. Invasive diameters were measured in pathological specimens. Twenty-two AISs (16 GGNs [7 Ga, 5 Gb, 2 Gc, 1 Ga + Gc, 1 Gb + Gc], 4 part-solids, and 2 heterogeneous), 6 MIAs (1 GGN [Gb + Gc], 3 part-solids, and 2 solids), and 20 IVAs (1 GGN [Gb], 3 part-solids, and 16 solid) were found. The longest diameter (mean ± standard deviation) of the solid portion and total tumor were 9.7 ± 9.7 and 18.9 ± 5.6 mm, respectively. Significant differences in TSCT findings between AIS and IVA were margin of nodule (Pearson chi-squared test, P = 0.004), distribution of air bronchiologram (P = 0.0148), and pleural indentation (P = 0.0067). A solid portion >5.3 mm on TSCT indicated MIA or IVA, and >7.3 mm indicated IVA (receiver operating characteristic analysis, P < 0.0001). Irregular margin, air bronchiologram with disruption and/or irregular dilatation, and pleural indentation may distinguish IVA from AIS. A 5.3 to 7.3 mm solid portion on TSCT indicates MIA/IVA, and a solid portion >7.3 mm on TSCT indicates IVA.
评估能区分原位腺癌(AIS)、微浸润腺癌(MIA)和浸润性腺癌(IVA)的薄层计算机断层扫描(CT)(TSCT)特征,并确定CT上与病理浸润成分相关的实性部分大小。纳入48例患者。结节分为磨玻璃结节(GGN)、部分实性结节、实性结节和混杂性结节。使用参考标准图像主观评估GGN的视觉密度:淡薄GGN(Ga),<-700亨氏单位(HU);中等GGN(Gb),-700至-400 HU;致密GGN(Gc),>-400 HU;以及混合型(Ga+Gb、Ga+Gc和Gb+Gc)。评估的TSCT表现包括结节边缘、实性部分分布、空气支气管征分布和胸膜凹陷。测量实性部分和整个肿瘤的最长径。在病理标本上测量浸润径。发现22例AIS(16例GGN [7例Ga、5例Gb、2例Gc、1例Ga+Gc、1例Gb+Gc]、4例部分实性结节和2例混杂性结节)、6例MIA(1例GGN [Gb+Gc]、3例部分实性结节和2例实性结节)和20例IVA(1例GGN [Gb]、3例部分实性结节和16例实性结节)。实性部分和肿瘤总体的最长径(均值±标准差)分别为9.7±9.7和18.9±5.6 mm。AIS和IVA之间TSCT表现的显著差异在于结节边缘(Pearson卡方检验,P = 0.004)、空气支气管征分布(P = 0.0148)和胸膜凹陷(P = 0.0067)。TSCT上实性部分>5.3 mm提示MIA或IVA,>7.3 mm提示IVA(受试者操作特征分析,P<0.0001)。边缘不规则、中断和/或不规则扩张的空气支气管征以及胸膜凹陷可将IVA与AIS区分开来。TSCT上5.3至7.3 mm的实性部分提示MIA/IVA,TSCT上>7.3 mm的实性部分提示IVA。