• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.使用计算机化临床决策支持系统预防手术患者静脉血栓栓塞症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):638-645. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0131.
2
Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.对有静脉血栓栓塞风险的住院患者实施血栓预防的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;4(4):CD008201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008201.pub3.
3
Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism.联合间歇性气动腿部压迫和药物预防预防静脉血栓栓塞症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 28;1(1):CD005258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005258.pub4.
4
Screening for thrombophilia in high-risk situations: systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) study.高风险情况下的易栓症筛查:系统评价与成本效益分析。易栓症筛查的血栓形成:风险与经济评估(TREATS)研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(11):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta10110.
5
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism.用于预防静脉血栓栓塞的神经肌肉电刺激
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD011764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011764.pub2.
6
Secondary prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism after initial oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism.初发性无诱因静脉血栓栓塞症患者初始口服抗凝治疗后复发性静脉血栓栓塞症的二级预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011088.pub2.
7
Pharmacological interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in people undergoing bariatric surgery.药物干预预防接受减重手术人群的静脉血栓栓塞症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 22;11(11):CD013683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013683.pub2.
8
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.抗血小板药物治疗深静脉血栓形成。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 25;7(7):CD012369. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012369.pub2.
9
Effect of testing for cancer on cancer- and venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related mortality and morbidity in people with unprovoked VTE.对无诱因静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者进行癌症检测对癌症及VTE相关死亡率和发病率的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;8(8):CD010837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010837.pub3.
10
Effect of testing for cancer on cancer- or venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related mortality and morbidity in people with unprovoked VTE.不明原因静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者中,检测癌症对癌症或静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)相关死亡率和发病率的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 1;10(10):CD010837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010837.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating and Improving Knowledge of DVT Prophylaxis Among Healthcare Professionals at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Study.评估并提高巴基斯坦卡拉奇一家三级护理医院医护人员对深静脉血栓形成预防的认知:一项质量改进研究。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025 Jan-Dec;31:10760296251345474. doi: 10.1177/10760296251345474. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Acceptance of artificial intelligence clinical assistant decision support system to prevent and control venous thromboembolism among healthcare workers: an extend Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model.医护人员对预防和控制静脉血栓栓塞的人工智能临床辅助决策支持系统的接受度:扩展的技术接受与使用统一理论模型
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 11;12:1475577. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1475577. eCollection 2025.
3
A clinical decision support tool for improving venous thromboembolism risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis prescribing compliance within an electronic medication management system: a retrospective observational study.一种用于改善电子药物管理系统中静脉血栓栓塞风险评估和血栓预防处方依从性的临床决策支持工具:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun;47(3):699-707. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01857-0. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
4
Impact of Clinical Decision Support with Mandatory versus Voluntary Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者中强制性与自愿性静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的临床决策支持影响
TH Open. 2024 Sep 12;8(3):e317-e328. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1790519. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Venous thromboembolism risk models may be ready for a makeover.静脉血栓栓塞风险模型可能需要改进。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101732. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101732.
6
Risk factors for patients with acute hospital-acquired symptomatic pulmonary thromboembolism.急性医院获得性有症状肺血栓栓塞症患者的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 9;13(1):7552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34589-8.
7
Systematic User-centered Design of a Prototype Clinical Decision Support System for Glaucoma.青光眼原型临床决策支持系统的系统性用户中心设计
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Feb 2;3(3):100279. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100279. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Provider Response to a Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis Ordering Tool: Observational Study.医疗机构对静脉血栓栓塞风险评估和预防处方工具的反应:观察性研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):1214-1222. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759770. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
9
Alert-Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.基于警示触发的患者教育与护士反馈在预防静脉血栓栓塞症非医嘱用药中的效果比较:一项整群随机对照试验
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 20;11(18):e027119. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027119. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
The effect of information technology intervention on using appropriate VTE prophylaxis in non-surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.信息技术干预对非手术患者使用适当静脉血栓栓塞预防措施的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 17;8:20552076221118828. doi: 10.1177/20552076221118828. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of extended-duration prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in major urologic oncology surgery.延长疗程预防主要泌尿外科肿瘤手术中静脉血栓栓塞的有效性和安全性。
Urol Oncol. 2015 Sep;33(9):387.e7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
2
Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与电子健康记录相关的计算机化决策支持系统的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):e12-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302164. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
3
Chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology.耳鼻喉科静脉血栓栓塞的化学预防
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Nov;140(11):999-1005. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2254.
4
Inadequate venous thromboembolism risk stratification predicts venous thromboembolic events in surgical intensive care unit patients.手术重症监护病房患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估不足预测静脉血栓栓塞事件。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):898-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.046. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
5
Improved blood utilization using real-time clinical decision support.实时临床决策支持可提高血液利用率。
Transfusion. 2014 May;54(5):1358-65. doi: 10.1111/trf.12445. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
6
Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.对有静脉血栓栓塞风险的住院内科和外科患者实施血栓预防的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 16(7):CD008201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008201.pub2.
7
Practices to prevent venous thromboembolism: a brief review.预防静脉血栓栓塞症的实践:简要回顾。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Mar;23(3):187-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001782. Epub 2013 May 24.
8
A clinical decision support system for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a general hospital in a middle-income country.在中等收入国家的一家综合医院中,一个用于静脉血栓栓塞预防的临床决策支持系统。
J Bras Pneumol. 2013 Mar-Apr;39(2):138-46. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132013000200004.
9
Improved prophylaxis and decreased rates of preventable harm with the use of a mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool for prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in trauma.使用强制性计算机化临床决策支持工具预防创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞,预防措施得到改进,可预防伤害的发生率降低。
Arch Surg. 2012 Oct;147(10):901-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.2024.
10
Effectiveness of a novel and scalable clinical decision support intervention to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a quasi-experimental study.一种新型且可扩展的临床决策支持干预措施提高静脉血栓栓塞症预防效果的效果:一项准实验研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Aug 31;12:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-92.

使用计算机化临床决策支持系统预防手术患者静脉血栓栓塞症:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Use of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Wyss Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):638-645. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0131.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0131
PMID:28297002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5831455/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Health care professionals do not adequately stratify risk or provide prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) among surgical patients. Computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) have been implemented to assist clinicians and improve prophylaxis for VTE.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of implementing CCDSSs on the ordering of VTE prophylaxis and the rates of VTE.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE via OVID, EMBASE via OVID, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched in June 2016 for articles published in English from October 15, 1991, to February 16, 2016. A manual search of references from relevant articles was also performed.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical trials and observational studies among surgical patients comparing CCDSSs with VTE risk stratification and assistance in ordering prophylaxis vs routine care without decision support were included. Of the 188 articles screened, 11 (5.9%) were eligible for meta-analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality independently.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rates of prophylaxis for VTE and VTE events. Random- and fixed-effects models were used to summarize odds ratios and risk ratios.

RESULTS

Eleven articles (9 prospective cohort trials and 2 retrospective cohort trials) comprising 156 366 individuals (104 241 in the intervention group and 52 125 in the control group) were included. The use of CCDSSs was associated with a significant increase in the rate of appropriate ordering of prophylaxis for VTE (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.78-3.10; P < .001) and a significant decrease in the risk of VTE events (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Use of CCDSSs increases the proportion of surgical patients who were prescribed adequate prophylaxis for VTE and correlates with a reduction in VTE events.

摘要

重要性

医疗保健专业人员不能充分评估手术患者的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)风险或为其提供预防措施。已实施计算机临床决策支持系统(CCDSS)以协助临床医生并改善 VTE 的预防措施。

目的

评估实施 CCDSS 对 VTE 预防措施的开具和 VTE 发生率的影响。

数据来源

2016 年 6 月,通过 OVID 检索 PubMed、MEDLINE、OVID 检索 EMBASE、Scopus、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 clinicaltrials.gov,检索自 1991 年 10 月 15 日至 2016 年 2 月 16 日发表的英文文章。还对相关文章的参考文献进行了手动搜索。

研究选择

包括比较 CCDSS 与 VTE 风险分层以及协助开具预防措施与无决策支持的常规护理的手术患者的临床试验和观察性研究。在筛选出的 188 篇文章中,有 11 篇(5.9%)符合荟萃分析条件。

数据提取与综合

遵循观察性研究的流行病学指南进行荟萃分析。两位评审员独立提取数据并评估质量。

主要结局和测量指标

VTE 预防措施和 VTE 事件的发生率。使用随机效应和固定效应模型汇总优势比和风险比。

结果

纳入了 11 篇文章(9 项前瞻性队列研究和 2 项回顾性队列研究),共纳入 156366 名患者(干预组 104241 名,对照组 52125 名)。使用 CCDSS 与预防 VTE 的适当开具率显著增加相关(优势比,2.35;95%CI,1.78-3.10;P<0.001),与 VTE 事件的风险降低相关(风险比,0.78;95%CI,0.72-0.85;P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

使用 CCDSS 增加了开具适当 VTE 预防措施的手术患者比例,并与 VTE 事件的减少相关。