Suppr超能文献

上盂唇前后部损伤动态盂唇剪切试验的临床评估

Clinical Assessment of the Dynamic Labral Shear Test for Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior Lesions.

作者信息

Sodha Sonal, Srikumaran Uma, Choi Kyubo, Borade Amrut U, McFarland Edward G

机构信息

Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(4):775-781. doi: 10.1177/0363546517690349. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions through physical examination remains challenging. The dynamic labral shear test (DLST) has been shown to have likelihood ratios (LRs) of 31.6 and 1.1 for diagnosing SLAP lesions.

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical utility of the DLST for diagnosing SLAP lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

This prospective, consecutive case series included 774 patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy and a preoperative DLST between 2007 and 2013. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 610 control patients with no SLAP lesion but with other abnormalities, 9 patients with isolated SLAP lesion (ISL), and 155 patients with concomitant SLAP lesion (CSL), who had a SLAP lesion and another shoulder abnormality. We determined sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), odds ratio (OR), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of the DLST with and without other tests.

RESULTS

The DLST was positive for 242 of 610 controls (40%), 7 of 9 patients (78%) in the ISL group, and 88 of 155 patients (57%) in the CSL group. In the ISL group, the DLST had a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 51%, PPV of 2%, NPV of 100%, OR of 3.58, and DA of 51%. In comparison, the ORs were 1.09 for the active compression test, 1.30 for the lift-off test, and 1.53 for the relocation test, which were not significantly different from each other. For diagnosing a SLAP lesion existing in a joint with other associated injury, the DLST had a sensitivity of 57%, specificity of 52%, PPV of 23%, NPV of 83%, OR of 1.4, and DA of 53%. Combining all 4 tests did not improve the OR for detecting ISLs or CSLs.

CONCLUSION

The DLST is sensitive but not specific for detecting ISLs. With an OR of 3.58, the DLST is useful for diagnosing ISLs. However, in patients who have CSLs, the DLST is not as useful for diagnosing SLAP lesions.

摘要

背景

通过体格检查诊断上盂唇前后部(SLAP)损伤仍然具有挑战性。动态盂唇剪切试验(DLST)诊断SLAP损伤的似然比(LR)分别为31.6和1.1。

目的

确定DLST诊断SLAP损伤的临床效用。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据等级,2级。

方法

这项前瞻性连续病例系列研究纳入了2007年至2013年间接受诊断性关节镜检查和术前DLST的774例患者。患者分为3组:610例无SLAP损伤但有其他异常的对照患者、9例孤立性SLAP损伤(ISL)患者和155例合并SLAP损伤(CSL)患者,后者既有SLAP损伤又有其他肩部异常。我们确定了DLST在有或无其他检查情况下的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、比值比(OR)和诊断准确性(DA)。

结果

610例对照患者中有242例(40%)DLST呈阳性,ISL组9例患者中有7例(78%)呈阳性,CSL组155例患者中有88例(57%)呈阳性。在ISL组中,DLST的敏感性为78%,特异性为51%,PPV为2%,NPV为100%,OR为3.58,DA为51%。相比之下,主动压缩试验的OR为1.09,抬起试验为1.30,复位试验为1.53,彼此之间无显著差异。对于诊断存在于伴有其他相关损伤关节中的SLAP损伤,DLST的敏感性为57%,特异性为52%,PPV为23%,NPV为83%,OR为1.4,DA为53%。联合所有4项检查并未提高检测ISL或CSL的OR。

结论

DLST检测ISL敏感但不特异。OR为3.58,DLST对诊断ISL有用。然而,在CSL患者中,DLST对诊断SLAP损伤不太有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验