Suppr超能文献

当临床医生检查肩部时,哪些体格检查测试提供的价值最大?对个体测试的系统评价和荟萃分析更新。

Which physical examination tests provide clinicians with the most value when examining the shoulder? Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests.

机构信息

Physical Therapy, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina 27262, USA.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;46(14):964-78. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091066. Epub 2012 Jul 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To update our previously published systematic review and meta-analysis by subjecting the literature on shoulder physical examination (ShPE) to careful analysis in order to determine each tests clinical utility.

METHODS

This review is an update of previous work, therefore the terms in the Medline and CINAHL search strategies remained the same with the exception that the search was confined to the dates November, 2006 through to February, 2012. The previous study dates were 1966 - October, 2006. Further, the original search was expanded, without date restrictions, to include two new databases: EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, version 2 (QUADAS 2) tool was used to critique the quality of each new paper. Where appropriate, data from the prior review and this review were combined to perform meta-analysis using the updated hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic and bivariate models.

RESULTS

Since the publication of the 2008 review, 32 additional studies were identified and critiqued. For subacromial impingement, the meta-analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity for the Neer test was 72% and 60%, respectively, for the Hawkins-Kennedy test was 79% and 59%, respectively, and for the painful arc was 53% and 76%, respectively. Also from the meta-analysis, regarding superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears, the test with the best sensitivity (52%) was the relocation test; the test with the best specificity (95%) was Yergason's test; and the test with the best positive likelihood ratio (2.81) was the compression-rotation test. Regarding new (to this series of reviews) ShPE tests, where meta-analysis was not possible because of lack of sufficient studies or heterogeneity between studies, there are some individual tests that warrant further investigation. A highly specific test (specificity >80%, LR+ ≥ 5.0) from a low bias study is the passive distraction test for a SLAP lesion. This test may rule in a SLAP lesion when positive. A sensitive test (sensitivity >80%, LR- ≤ 0.20) of note is the shoulder shrug sign, for stiffness-related disorders (osteoarthritis and adhesive capsulitis) as well as rotator cuff tendinopathy. There are six additional tests with higher sensitivities, specificities, or both but caution is urged since all of these tests have been studied only once and more than one ShPE test (ie, active compression, biceps load II) has been introduced with great diagnostic statistics only to have further research fail to replicate the results of the original authors. The belly-off and modified belly press tests for subscapularis tendinopathy, bony apprehension test for bony instability, olecranon-manubrium percussion test for bony abnormality, passive compression for a SLAP lesion, and the lateral Jobe test for rotator cuff tear give reason for optimism since they demonstrated both high sensitivities and specificities reported in low bias studies. Finally, one additional test was studied in two separate papers. The dynamic labral shear may be sensitive for SLAP lesions but, when modified, be diagnostic of labral tears generally.

CONCLUSION

Based on data from the original 2008 review and this update, the use of any single ShPE test to make a pathognomonic diagnosis cannot be unequivocally recommended. There exist some promising tests but their properties must be confirmed in more than one study. Combinations of ShPE tests provide better accuracy, but marginally so. These findings seem to provide support for stressing a comprehensive clinical examination including history and physical examination. However, there is a great need for large, prospective, well-designed studies that examine the diagnostic accuracy of the many aspects of the clinical examination and what combinations of these aspects are useful in differentially diagnosing pathologies of the shoulder.

摘要

目的

通过对肩部体格检查(ShPE)文献进行仔细分析,更新我们之前发表的系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定每项检查的临床效用。

方法

本综述是之前工作的更新,因此,Medline 和 CINAHL 搜索策略中的术语保持不变,只是将搜索范围限制在 2006 年 11 月至 2012 年 2 月。之前的研究日期为 1966 年至 2006 年 10 月。此外,原始搜索范围扩大,无日期限制,包括两个新的数据库:EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆。使用 QUADAS 2 工具(诊断准确性研究质量评估工具,版本 2)对每篇新论文的质量进行评估。在适当的情况下,将先前综述和本综述中的数据结合起来,使用更新的分层综合接收者操作特征和双变量模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

自 2008 年综述发表以来,又确定并评估了 32 项额外的研究。对于肩峰下撞击症,荟萃分析显示 Neer 试验的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 72%和 60%,Hawkins-Kennedy 试验分别为 79%和 59%,疼痛弧试验分别为 53%和 76%。同样来自荟萃分析,关于肩袖上盂唇前-后(SLAP)撕裂,敏感性最佳的检查(52%)是复位试验;特异性最佳的检查(95%)是 Yergason 试验;阳性似然比最佳的检查(2.81)是压缩-旋转试验。关于新的(本系列综述)ShPE 试验,由于缺乏足够的研究或研究之间存在异质性,无法进行荟萃分析,因此有一些个别试验值得进一步研究。一项高特异性试验(特异性>80%,LR+≥5.0)来自低偏倚研究,是 SLAP 病变的被动分离试验。当该试验阳性时,可能会提示 SLAP 病变。一项值得注意的敏感试验(敏感性>80%,LR-≤0.20)是肩部耸肩征,用于与僵硬相关的疾病(骨关节炎和粘连性囊炎)以及肩袖肌腱病。还有六项试验具有更高的敏感性、特异性或两者兼有,但需要谨慎,因为所有这些试验仅研究过一次,而且已经引入了不止一项 ShPE 试验(即主动压迫、二头肌负荷 II),具有出色的诊断统计学结果,但进一步的研究未能复制原始作者的结果。用于肩胛下肌腱病的腹侧离腹和改良腹侧按压试验、骨不稳定性的骨性触诊试验、骨异常的鹰嘴-胸骨敲击试验、SLAP 病变的被动压迫试验以及肩袖撕裂的外侧 Jobe 试验均具有较高的敏感性和特异性,因此令人乐观。最后,有一项试验在两篇单独的论文中进行了研究。动态盂唇剪切试验可能对 SLAP 病变敏感,但在修改后,可诊断一般的盂唇撕裂。

结论

基于原始 2008 年综述和本次更新的数据,不能明确推荐使用任何单一的 ShPE 检查来进行明确的诊断。有一些有前途的试验,但它们的特性必须在不止一项研究中得到证实。ShPE 试验的组合可以提高准确性,但只是略有提高。这些发现似乎支持强调全面的临床检查,包括病史和体格检查。然而,非常需要进行大型、前瞻性、精心设计的研究,以检查临床检查的许多方面的诊断准确性,以及这些方面的组合在鉴别肩部病变方面的有用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验