Suppr超能文献

国家儿科质量措施分类。

Categorization of National Pediatric Quality Measures.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire;

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3269. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The number of quality measures has grown dramatically in recent years. This growth has outpaced research characterizing content and impact of these metrics. Our study aimed to identify and classify nationally promoted quality metrics applicable to children, both by type and by content, and to analyze the representation of common pediatric issues among available measures.

METHODS

We identified nationally applicable quality measure collections from organizational databases or clearinghouses, federal Web sites, and key informant interviews and then screened each measure for pediatric applicability. We classified measures as structure, process, or outcome using a Donabedian framework. Additionally, we classified process measures as targeting underuse, overuse, or misuse of health services. We then classified measures by content area and compared disease-specific metrics to frequency of diagnoses observed among children.

RESULTS

A total of 386 identified measures were relevant to pediatric patients; exclusion of duplicates left 257 unique measures. The majority of pediatric measures were process measures (59%), most of which target underuse of health services (77%). Among disease-specific measures, those related to depression and asthma were the most common, reflecting the prevalence and importance of these conditions in pediatrics. Conditions such as respiratory infection and otitis media had fewer associated measures despite their prevalence. Other notable pediatric issues lacking associated measures included care of medically complex children and injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric quality measures are predominated by process measures targeting underuse of health care services. The content represented among these measures is broad, although there remain important gaps.

摘要

背景与目的

近年来,质量指标的数量急剧增加。这种增长速度超过了对这些指标的内容和影响进行描述的研究速度。我们的研究旨在通过类型和内容来识别和分类适用于儿童的全国推广的质量指标,并分析现有指标中常见儿科问题的代表性。

方法

我们从组织数据库或信息中心、联邦网站以及关键知情人访谈中确定了适用于全国的质量指标集,然后对每个指标进行了儿科适用性筛选。我们使用 Donabedian 框架将措施分为结构、过程或结果。此外,我们将过程措施分为针对卫生服务的使用不足、过度使用或误用。然后,我们按内容领域对措施进行分类,并将特定疾病的指标与儿童中观察到的诊断频率进行比较。

结果

共识别出 386 项与儿科患者相关的措施;排除重复项后,留下了 257 项独特的措施。大多数儿科措施都是过程措施(59%),其中大多数针对卫生服务的使用不足(77%)。在特定疾病的指标中,与抑郁和哮喘相关的指标最为常见,反映了这些疾病在儿科中的普遍性和重要性。尽管这些疾病很常见,但与呼吸道感染和中耳炎相关的措施却较少。其他一些缺乏相关措施的重要儿科问题包括对复杂医疗儿童和受伤的护理。

结论

儿科质量指标主要是针对卫生保健服务使用不足的过程措施。这些措施所代表的内容广泛,但仍存在重要差距。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验