Matos António P, Semelka Richard C, Herédia Vasco, AlObaidiy Mamdoh, Gomes Filipe Veloso, Ramalho Miguel
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, and Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Radiol Bras. 2017 Jan-Feb;50(1):19-25. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0102.
To describe a modified approach to the evaluation of adrenal nodules using a standard abdominal magnetic resonance imaging protocol.
Our sample comprised 149 subjects (collectively presenting with 132 adenomas and 40 nonadenomas). The adrenal signal intensity index was calculated. Lesions were grouped by pattern of enhancement (PE), according to the phase during which the wash-in peaked: arterial phase (type 1 PE); portal venous phase (type 2 PE); and interstitial phase (type 3 PE). The relative and absolute wash-out values were calculated. To test for mean differences between adenomas and nonadenomas, Student's -tests were used. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was also performed.
The mean adrenal signal intensity index was significantly higher for the adenomas than for the nonadenomas ( < 0.0001). Chemical shift imaging showed a sensitivity and specificity of 94.4% and 100%, respectively, for differentiating adenomas from nonadenomas. Of the adenomas, 47.6%, 48.5%, and 3.9%, respectively, exhibited type 1, 2, and 3 PEs. For the mean wash-in proportions, significant differences were found among the enhancement patterns. The wash-out calculations revealed a trend toward better lesion differentiation for lesions exhibiting a type 1 PE, showing a sensitivity and specificity of 71.4% and 80.0%, respectively, when the absolute values were referenced, as well as for lesions exhibiting a type 2 PE, showing a sensitivity and specificity of 68.0% and 100%, respectively, when the relative values were referenced. The calculated probability of a lipid-poor lesion that exhibited a type 3 PE being a nonadenoma was > 99%.
Subgrouping dynamic enhancement patterns yields high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating adenomas from nonadenomas.
描述一种使用标准腹部磁共振成像方案评估肾上腺结节的改良方法。
我们的样本包括149名受试者(共出现132个腺瘤和40个非腺瘤)。计算肾上腺信号强度指数。根据强化峰值出现的阶段,将病变按强化模式(PE)分组:动脉期(1型PE);门静脉期(2型PE);和间质期(3型PE)。计算相对和绝对洗脱值。为检验腺瘤和非腺瘤之间的平均差异,使用了学生t检验。还进行了受试者操作特征曲线分析。
腺瘤的平均肾上腺信号强度指数显著高于非腺瘤(<0.0001)。化学位移成像在区分腺瘤和非腺瘤方面的敏感性和特异性分别为94.4%和100%。在腺瘤中,分别有47.6%、48.5%和3.9%表现为1型、2型和3型PE。对于平均强化比例,在强化模式之间发现了显著差异。洗脱计算显示,对于表现为1型PE的病变,在参考绝对值时,其敏感性和特异性分别为71.4%和80.0%,对于表现为2型PE的病变,在参考相对值时,其敏感性和特异性分别为68.0%和100%,这两种病变在病变区分方面有更好的趋势。计算出表现为3型PE的低脂病变为非腺瘤的概率>99%。
对动态强化模式进行亚组分析在区分腺瘤和非腺瘤方面具有较高的诊断准确性。