1Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Dr, CB 7510, 2001 Old Clinic Bldg, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Aug;197(2):415-23. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5848.
The purpose of this study was to use previously described quantitative evaluation methods to compare the performance of 3D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and magnetization-prepared (MP) GRE in-phase and out-of phase sequences with standard 2D GRE technique in the characterization of adrenal lesions.
The study sample consisted of 44 consecutively registered patients (22 men, 22 women; mean age, 59.1 ± 11.6 years) with 50 adrenal lesions who underwent standard abdominal MRI that included in-phase and out-of-phase 2D GRE (n = 41), 3D GRE (n = 35), MP GRE (n = 36), or a combination of these techniques. The adrenal signal intensity (SI) index and adrenal-to-spleen, adrenal-to-liver, and adrenal-to-muscle SI ratios of each lesion were calculated and compared for the three techniques by independent samples Student t test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for each evaluation method was determined, and comparisons of independent ROC curves were performed for all sequences.
For all sequences, the mean adrenal SI index and SI ratios of adenomas and nonadenomas differed significantly (p < 0.001). For the 3D GRE and MP GRE techniques, adrenal SI index and modified adrenal-to-spleen ratio, respectively, had the larger AUCs, but the difference was not statistically significant. Different thresholds for the three techniques were recommended for discriminating adenoma from nonadenoma.
The results of characterization of adrenal lesions with MP GRE and 3D GRE in-phase and out-of-phase MRI techniques are comparable to those obtained with the reference standard 2D GRE technique. Different thresholds should be selected according to the in-phase and out-of-phase techniques used and for the various evaluation methods.
本研究旨在使用先前描述的定量评估方法,比较 3D 梯度回波(GRE)和磁化准备(MP)GRE 同相和反相位序列与标准 2D GRE 技术在肾上腺病变特征描述方面的性能。
研究样本包括 44 例连续登记的患者(22 名男性,22 名女性;平均年龄 59.1±11.6 岁),这些患者共 50 个肾上腺病变,均接受了包括同相和反相位 2D GRE(n=41)、3D GRE(n=35)、MP GRE(n=36)或这些技术组合的标准腹部 MRI 检查。计算并比较了每种病变的肾上腺信号强度(SI)指数和肾上腺与脾脏、肾上腺与肝脏、肾上腺与肌肉的 SI 比值,采用独立样本 t 检验进行比较。确定了每个评估方法的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC),并对所有序列进行了独立 ROC 曲线比较。
对于所有序列,腺瘤和非腺瘤的平均肾上腺 SI 指数和 SI 比值差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。对于 3D GRE 和 MP GRE 技术,分别为肾上腺 SI 指数和改良肾上腺与脾脏比值具有更大的 AUC,但差异无统计学意义。推荐了三种技术的不同阈值,用于区分腺瘤和非腺瘤。
使用 MP GRE 和 3D GRE 同相和反相 MRI 技术对肾上腺病变的特征描述结果与参考标准 2D GRE 技术相当。应根据使用的同相和反相技术以及各种评估方法选择不同的阈值。