• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性腰椎神经根病患者中,透视引导下经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇和局部麻醉药与保守治疗的比较

Comparison of fluoroscopic Guided Transforaminal Epidural Injections of Steroid and Local Anaesthetic with Conservative Management in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathies.

作者信息

Mehta Nandita, Salaria Misbah, Salaria A Q

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Department of Orthopaedics, Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186868.

DOI:10.4103/0259-1162.186868
PMID:28298750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5341643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic lumbar radiculopathy is a common medical problem and the treatment modalities used over years have been many ranging from conservative or symptomatic management to open decompression surgery. This study was aimed at to compare two modalities of treatment, i.e., conservative and lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients of American Society of Anesthesiology class - (a healthy patient or a patient with mild systemic disease) were randomized to two groups. Group C ( = 60) were managed conservatively with bed rest, analgesics, and physiotherapy. Group T ( = 60) received lumbar TFESIs with methylprednisolone 40 mg with 2 ml bupivacaine (0.5%). Measurements using visual analog scale (VAS) were taken before treatment and at various time intervals after the start of treatment.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference regarding the demographic characteristics of both groups. The VAS scores were less and statistically significant in Group T after 30 min postinjection, at the 2 week and after 1 month. Recovery rate of straight leg raise test was found to be 98% in those treated with TFESI. The Group T had significantly better patient satisfaction score and additionally there was drug dose intake reduction before and after the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with fluoroscopic-guided TFESI have better pain relief, quality-of-life, and less analgesic requirement than those managed conservatively.

摘要

背景

慢性腰椎神经根病是一个常见的医学问题,多年来使用的治疗方式多种多样,从保守或对症治疗到开放减压手术。本研究旨在比较两种治疗方式,即保守治疗和腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)。

材料与方法

总共120例美国麻醉医师协会分级为(健康患者或轻度全身性疾病患者)的患者被随机分为两组。C组(n = 60)采用卧床休息、镇痛药物和物理治疗进行保守治疗。T组(n = 60)接受含40 mg甲泼尼龙和2 ml布比卡因(0.5%)的腰椎TFESI治疗。在治疗前以及治疗开始后的不同时间间隔,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量。

结果

两组的人口统计学特征无统计学显著差异。注射后30分钟、2周及1个月后,T组的VAS评分更低且具有统计学显著性。经TFESI治疗的患者直腿抬高试验的恢复率为98%。T组患者满意度评分显著更高,并且治疗前后的药物剂量摄入减少。

结论

与保守治疗的患者相比,接受透视引导下TFESI治疗的患者疼痛缓解更好、生活质量更高且镇痛需求更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/7977be84b20d/AER-11-17-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/a7a0274c065c/AER-11-17-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/934f3f9e9935/AER-11-17-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/c18484cecacc/AER-11-17-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/8ce12d50229b/AER-11-17-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/f1a42dc64581/AER-11-17-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/b64eabc52870/AER-11-17-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/7977be84b20d/AER-11-17-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/a7a0274c065c/AER-11-17-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/934f3f9e9935/AER-11-17-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/c18484cecacc/AER-11-17-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/8ce12d50229b/AER-11-17-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/f1a42dc64581/AER-11-17-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/b64eabc52870/AER-11-17-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f89/5341643/7977be84b20d/AER-11-17-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of fluoroscopic Guided Transforaminal Epidural Injections of Steroid and Local Anaesthetic with Conservative Management in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathies.慢性腰椎神经根病患者中,透视引导下经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇和局部麻醉药与保守治疗的比较
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186868.
2
The Clinical Efficacy for Two-Level Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.两级经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的临床疗效
PM R. 2017 Apr;9(4):377-382. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
3
Plasma disc decompression compared with fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections for symptomatic contained lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.对比有症状的包容性腰椎间盘突出症的经皮穿刺腰椎间盘切除术和透视引导下经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Apr;12(4):357-71. doi: 10.3171/2009.10.SPINE09208.
4
A minimum of 5-year follow-up after lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症所致神经根性腰痛患者行腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗后的至少 5 年随访。
Spine J. 2018 Jan;18(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.264. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Effectiveness of transforaminal epidural steroid injections in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliotic stenosis and radiculopathy.经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗退变性腰椎侧凸狭窄症和神经根病的疗效
Pain Physician. 2004 Jul;7(3):311-7.
6
Comparison of Epidural Steroid Injection Efficiency with Two Different Doses in Radiculopathies Associated with Lumbar Disc Herniation.两种不同剂量硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症相关神经根病的疗效比较
World Neurosurg. 2019 Apr;124:e163-e168. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.056. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
7
Transforaminal epidural steroid injection via a preganglionic approach for lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar discogenic pain with radiculopathy.经节前入路的经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰椎管狭窄症和伴有神经根病的腰椎间盘源性疼痛。
Neurol India. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(2):248-52. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.63807.
8
Digital subtraction angiography does not reliably prevent paraplegia associated with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.数字减影血管造影并不能可靠地预防腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射相关的截瘫。
Pain Physician. 2012 Nov-Dec;15(6):515-23.
9
Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar intervertebral disc herniations.椎板间与经椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症
Pain Physician. 2006 Oct;9(4):361-6.
10
Lumbar retrodiscal versus post-ganglionic transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniations.经椎间孔硬膜外腔类固醇注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症:后路椎间盘内 versus 节后。
Pain Physician. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(4):353-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidural steroid injections in lumbar disc herniation- Evidence synthesis from 72 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and a total of 7701 patients.腰椎间盘突出症的硬膜外类固醇注射——来自72项随机对照试验(RCT)及共7701例患者的证据综合分析
Brain Spine. 2025 Mar 13;5:104216. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104216. eCollection 2025.
2
Treatment Effect of CT-Guided Periradicular Injections in Context of Different Contrast Agent Distribution Patterns.不同造影剂分布模式下CT引导下根管周围注射的治疗效果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 23;12(4):787. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040787.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidural injections for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the "control" injections in randomized controlled trials.硬膜外注射治疗脊柱疼痛:系统评价和荟萃分析评估随机对照试验中的“对照”注射。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Oct;119(4):907-31. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829c2ddd.
2
A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of fluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in chronic axial or discogenic low back pain: results of 2-year follow-up.一项在慢性轴向或椎间盘源性下腰痛患者中进行的透视下腰椎间孔硬膜外注射的随机、双盲、阳性药物对照试验:2 年随访结果。
Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):E491-504.
3
The risks of epidural and transforaminal steroid injections in the Spine: Commentary and a comprehensive review of the literature.
脊柱硬膜外和经椎间孔类固醇注射的风险:述评及文献综述
Surg Neurol Int. 2013 Mar 22;4(Suppl 2):S74-93. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.109446. Print 2013.
4
An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Part II: guidance and recommendations.慢性脊柱疼痛介入技术的综合循证指南更新。第二部分:指导和建议。
Pain Physician. 2013 Apr;16(2 Suppl):S49-283.
5
Results of 2-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in central spinal stenosis.中央型脊髓狭窄症的透视下经骶尾部硬膜外注射随机、双盲、对照试验的 2 年随访结果。
Pain Physician. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(5):371-84.
6
The effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain.腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗慢性下腰痛和下肢痛的效果。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(4):E363-404.
7
Effectiveness of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in managing lumbar spinal pain.治疗性腰椎椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰椎脊柱疼痛的效果。
Pain Physician. 2012 May-Jun;15(3):E199-245.
8
Lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in central spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, active control trial.腰椎间硬膜外注射治疗中央型脊髓狭窄症:一项随机、双盲、主动对照试验的初步结果。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):51-63.
9
Non-specific low back pain.非特异性下背痛。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
10
Lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain: a systematic review.腰椎椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗慢性下腰痛和下肢疼痛:一项系统评价
Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):163-88.