Bond strength of dental nanocomposites repaired with a bulkfill composite.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the bond strength of aged resin based nanocomposites repaired with the same and bulk fill composites.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-two disc shaped resin composites consisted of three different nanocomposite resins (Filtek Ultimate/FU, Herculite XRV Ultra/HXRV, and Reflectys/R) were produced. After storing the samples for 8 weeks in distilled water, each material was combined with the same material or the bulk-fill composite resin system (Filtek Ultimate+Filtek Ultimate/Group-1; Filtek Ultimate+Tetric BF/Group-2; Herculite XRV+Herculite XRV/Group-3; Herculite XRV+Tetric BF/ Group-4; Reflectys+Reflectys/Group 5; Reflectys+Tetric BF/Group-6), for repair. Then specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing(SBS), and the debonded surfaces were examined.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference among three materials(repaired with itself+bulk fill) for SBS testing values (=0.001). FU and R were found to be similar, while HXRV was significantly different from them. A significant difference between group-1 and 2 (=0.006) was detected, while there were no differences between group 3 and 4 (= 0.142), and 5 and 6 (=0.346). Among the six groups, repair SBS testing values with TBF were higher than repair with itself except for FU.

CONCLUSIONS

The bulk-fill repaired materials showed higher bond strength except for FU, which showed the highest SBS value when repaired with itself. An increased incidence of adhesive fracture was observed at low strengths. Resin-based composites, nanofillers, surface treatment, macro-shear, repair.