Bray Jeremy W, Hinde Jesse M, Kaiser David J, Mills Michael J, Karuntzos Georgia T, Genadek Katie R, Kelly Erin L, Kossek Ellen E, Hurtado David A
1 Department of Economics, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
2 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2018 May;32(4):963-970. doi: 10.1177/0890117117696244. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
To estimate the effects of a workplace initiative to reduce work-family conflict on employee performance.
A group-randomized multisite controlled experimental study with longitudinal follow-up.
An information technology firm.
Employees randomized to the intervention (n = 348) and control condition (n = 345).
An intervention, "Start. Transform. Achieve. Results." to enhance employees' control over their work time, to increase supervisors' support for this change, and to increase employees' and supervisors' focus on results.
We estimated the effect of the intervention on 9 self-reported employee performance measures using a difference-in-differences approach with generalized linear mixed models. Performance measures included actual and expected hours worked, absenteeism, and presenteeism.
This study found little evidence that an intervention targeting work-family conflict affected employee performance. The only significant effect of the intervention was an approximately 1-hour reduction in expected work hours. After Bonferroni correction, the intervention effect is marginally insignificant at 6 months and marginally significant at 12 and 18 months.
The intervention reduced expected working time by 1 hour per week; effects on most other employee self-reported performance measures were statistically insignificant. When coupled with the other positive wellness and firm outcomes, this intervention may be useful for improving employee perceptions of increased access to personal time or personal wellness without sacrificing performance. The null effects on performance provide countervailing evidence to recent negative press on work-family and flex work initiatives.
评估一项旨在减少工作与家庭冲突的职场倡议对员工绩效的影响。
一项具有纵向随访的群组随机多地点对照实验研究。
一家信息技术公司。
随机分为干预组(n = 348)和对照组(n = 345)的员工。
一项名为“开始。转变。实现。成果。”的干预措施,旨在增强员工对工作时间的掌控,增加主管对这一转变的支持,并提高员工和主管对成果的关注。
我们使用广义线性混合模型的差分法,估计了干预措施对9项自我报告的员工绩效指标的影响。绩效指标包括实际工作时长和预期工作时长、缺勤率和出勤不出力率。
本研究几乎没有发现证据表明针对工作与家庭冲突的干预措施会影响员工绩效。该干预措施唯一显著的效果是预期工作时长减少了约1小时。经过邦费罗尼校正后,干预效果在6个月时勉强不显著,在12个月和18个月时勉强显著。
该干预措施使预期工作时间每周减少了1小时;对大多数其他员工自我报告的绩效指标的影响在统计学上不显著。与其他积极的健康和公司成果相结合时,这项干预措施可能有助于提高员工对增加个人时间或个人健康的认知,而不影响绩效。对绩效的零效应为近期关于工作与家庭以及弹性工作倡议的负面报道提供了反证。