• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance: Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network.灵活性/支持性干预对工作绩效的影响:来自工作、家庭与健康网络的证据。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 May;32(4):963-970. doi: 10.1177/0890117117696244. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Human resource management training of supervisors for improving health and well-being of employees.为改善员工健康和福祉而对主管进行的人力资源管理培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 25;9(9):CD010905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010905.pub2.
3
Perceived workplace health support is associated with employee productivity.感知到的工作场所健康支持与员工生产力相关。
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(3):139-46. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.131216-QUAN-645.
4
The Effects of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Workplace Intervention on Sleep and Work-Family Conflict Outcomes in an Extended Care Setting.集群随机对照工作场所干预对长期护理环境中睡眠和工作-家庭冲突结果的影响。
Sleep Health. 2016 Dec;2(4):297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.09.002.
5
Age differences in workplace intervention effects on employees' nighttime and daytime sleep.工作场所干预对员工夜间和日间睡眠的影响的年龄差异。
Sleep Health. 2016 Dec;2(4):289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.08.004.
6
Costs of a work-family intervention: evidence from the work, family, and health network.工作-家庭干预的成本:来自工作、家庭与健康网络的证据
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(4):209-17. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.121108-QUAN-542. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
7
The Mediating Role of General and Cognitive Stress on the Effect of an App-Based Intervention on Productivity Measures in Workers: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于应用程序的干预对工人生产力措施影响的中介作用:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 3;25:e42317. doi: 10.2196/42317.
8
The Healthy Workplace Project: results of a hygiene-based approach to employee wellness.健康工作场所项目:基于卫生的员工健康方法的成果
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):339-41. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130830-ARB-459. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
9
Reducing stigma and increasing workplace productivity due to mental health difficulties in a large government organization in the UK: a protocol for a randomised control treatment trial (RCT) of a low intensity psychological intervention and stigma reduction programme for common mental disorder (Prevail).在英国的一个大型政府组织中,减少因心理健康问题而产生的耻辱感并提高工作场所的生产力:一项针对常见精神障碍(Prevail)的低强度心理干预和减少耻辱感计划的随机对照治疗试验(RCT)的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09054-0.
10
The influence of family-supportive supervisor training on employee job performance and attitudes: An organizational work-family intervention.家庭支持型主管培训对员工工作绩效和态度的影响:组织工作-家庭干预。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(3):296-308. doi: 10.1037/a0039961. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A meeting of positive behaviors: The relations of three aspects of flexibility with character strengths.积极行为的一次会面:灵活性的三个方面与性格优势的关系。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 3;13:1078764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1078764. eCollection 2022.
2
Alleviating work-family conflict for female employees in Iran: The effect of a multimedia educational intervention.缓解伊朗女性员工的工作-家庭冲突:多媒体教育干预的效果
Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 7:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03068-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Return on Investment of a Work-Family Intervention: Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network.工作-家庭干预的投资回报率:来自工作、家庭与健康网络的证据
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Sep;57(9):943-51. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000520.
2
Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network*.工作变化与工作-家庭冲突:来自工作、家庭与健康网络的证据*
Am Sociol Rev. 2014 Jun 1;79(3):485-516. doi: 10.1177/0003122414531435.
3
Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work?工作场所健康促进(健康养生)计划是否有效?
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Sep;56(9):927-34. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000276.
4
Designing Work, Family & Health Organizational Change Initiatives.设计工作、家庭与健康组织变革计划。
Organ Dyn. 2014;43(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.10.007.
5
Wellness incentives in the workplace: cost savings through cost shifting to unhealthy workers.工作场所的健康促进激励措施:通过向不健康的员工转移成本来节省成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):468-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0683.
6
Work-life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream.工作与生活平衡举措及组织变革:克服矛盾信息,从边缘走向主流。
Hum Relat. 2010 Jan;63(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/0018726709352385.
7
Getting There from Here: Research on the Effects of Work-Family Initiatives on Work-Family Conflict and Business Outcomes.从这里走向那里:工作与家庭倡议对工作-家庭冲突及企业成果影响的研究
Acad Manag Ann. 2008 Aug;2:305-349. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211610.
8
Do prevention or treatment services save money? The wrong debate.预防或治疗服务能省钱吗?这是个错误的争论。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):37-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.37.
9
The mental health effects of multiple work and family demands. A prospective study of psychiatric sickness absence in the French GAZEL study.多种工作和家庭需求对心理健康的影响。法国GAZEL研究中关于精神疾病缺勤情况的前瞻性研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;42(7):573-82. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0203-2. Epub 2007 May 24.
10
Mediation analysis.中介分析
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:593-614. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.

灵活性/支持性干预对工作绩效的影响:来自工作、家庭与健康网络的证据。

Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance: Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network.

作者信息

Bray Jeremy W, Hinde Jesse M, Kaiser David J, Mills Michael J, Karuntzos Georgia T, Genadek Katie R, Kelly Erin L, Kossek Ellen E, Hurtado David A

机构信息

1 Department of Economics, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.

2 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2018 May;32(4):963-970. doi: 10.1177/0890117117696244. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1177/0890117117696244
PMID:28299947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6719311/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the effects of a workplace initiative to reduce work-family conflict on employee performance.

DESIGN

A group-randomized multisite controlled experimental study with longitudinal follow-up.

SETTING

An information technology firm.

PARTICIPANTS

Employees randomized to the intervention (n = 348) and control condition (n = 345).

INTERVENTION

An intervention, "Start. Transform. Achieve. Results." to enhance employees' control over their work time, to increase supervisors' support for this change, and to increase employees' and supervisors' focus on results.

METHODS

We estimated the effect of the intervention on 9 self-reported employee performance measures using a difference-in-differences approach with generalized linear mixed models. Performance measures included actual and expected hours worked, absenteeism, and presenteeism.

RESULTS

This study found little evidence that an intervention targeting work-family conflict affected employee performance. The only significant effect of the intervention was an approximately 1-hour reduction in expected work hours. After Bonferroni correction, the intervention effect is marginally insignificant at 6 months and marginally significant at 12 and 18 months.

CONCLUSION

The intervention reduced expected working time by 1 hour per week; effects on most other employee self-reported performance measures were statistically insignificant. When coupled with the other positive wellness and firm outcomes, this intervention may be useful for improving employee perceptions of increased access to personal time or personal wellness without sacrificing performance. The null effects on performance provide countervailing evidence to recent negative press on work-family and flex work initiatives.

摘要

目的

评估一项旨在减少工作与家庭冲突的职场倡议对员工绩效的影响。

设计

一项具有纵向随访的群组随机多地点对照实验研究。

背景

一家信息技术公司。

参与者

随机分为干预组(n = 348)和对照组(n = 345)的员工。

干预措施

一项名为“开始。转变。实现。成果。”的干预措施,旨在增强员工对工作时间的掌控,增加主管对这一转变的支持,并提高员工和主管对成果的关注。

方法

我们使用广义线性混合模型的差分法,估计了干预措施对9项自我报告的员工绩效指标的影响。绩效指标包括实际工作时长和预期工作时长、缺勤率和出勤不出力率。

结果

本研究几乎没有发现证据表明针对工作与家庭冲突的干预措施会影响员工绩效。该干预措施唯一显著的效果是预期工作时长减少了约1小时。经过邦费罗尼校正后,干预效果在6个月时勉强不显著,在12个月和18个月时勉强显著。

结论

该干预措施使预期工作时间每周减少了1小时;对大多数其他员工自我报告的绩效指标的影响在统计学上不显著。与其他积极的健康和公司成果相结合时,这项干预措施可能有助于提高员工对增加个人时间或个人健康的认知,而不影响绩效。对绩效的零效应为近期关于工作与家庭以及弹性工作倡议的负面报道提供了反证。