Suppr超能文献

两阶段连续重新评估方法初始设计的选择。

Selection of the initial design for the two-stage continual reassessment method.

作者信息

Jia Xiaoyu, Ivanova Anastasia, Lee Shing M

机构信息

a Department of Population Health Science and Policy , Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York , New York , USA.

b Department of Biostatistics , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , North Carolina , USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(3):495-506. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1290650. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Abstract

In the two-stage continual reassessment method (CRM), model-based dose escalation is preceded by a pre-specified escalating sequence starting from the lowest dose level. This is appealing to clinicians because it allows a sufficient number of patients to be assigned to each of the lower dose levels before escalating to higher dose levels. While a theoretical framework to build the two-stage CRM has been proposed, the selection of the initial dose-escalating sequence, generally referred to as the initial design, remains arbitrary, either by specifying cohorts of three patients or by trial and error through extensive simulations. Motivated by a currently ongoing oncology dose-finding study for which clinicians explicitly stated their desire to assign at least one patient to each of the lower dose levels, we proposed a systematic approach for selecting the initial design for the two-stage CRM. The initial design obtained using the proposed algorithm yields better operating characteristics compared to using a cohort of three initial design with a calibrated CRM. The proposed algorithm simplifies the selection of initial design for the two-stage CRM. Moreover, initial designs to be used as reference for planning a two-stage CRM are provided.

摘要

在两阶段连续重新评估方法(CRM)中,基于模型的剂量递增之前是从最低剂量水平开始的预先指定的递增序列。这对临床医生很有吸引力,因为它允许在递增到更高剂量水平之前,将足够数量的患者分配到每个较低剂量水平。虽然已经提出了构建两阶段CRM的理论框架,但初始剂量递增序列(通常称为初始设计)的选择仍然是任意的,要么通过指定三名患者的队列,要么通过广泛模拟的试错法。受当前正在进行的肿瘤学剂量探索研究的启发,临床医生明确表示他们希望将至少一名患者分配到每个较低剂量水平,我们提出了一种系统方法来选择两阶段CRM的初始设计。与使用校准的CRM的三名患者队列的初始设计相比,使用所提出算法获得的初始设计具有更好的操作特性。所提出的算法简化了两阶段CRM初始设计的选择。此外,还提供了用作规划两阶段CRM参考的初始设计。

相似文献

1
Selection of the initial design for the two-stage continual reassessment method.
J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(3):495-506. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1290650. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
2
How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0638-z.
3
Model calibration in the continual reassessment method.
Clin Trials. 2009 Jun;6(3):227-38. doi: 10.1177/1740774509105076.
5
CRM2DIM: A SAS macro for implementing the dual-agent Bayesian continual reassessment method.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Jul;176:211-223. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
The Randomized CRM: An Approach to Overcoming the Long-Memory Property of the CRM.
J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(6):1028-1042. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1293076. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
9
Rolling continual reassessment method with overdose control: An efficient and safe dose escalation design.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106436. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106436. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.
Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):57-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn134oa.

本文引用的文献

1
The current design of oncology phase I clinical trials: progressing from algorithms to statistical models.
Chin Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar;3(1):2. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3865.2014.02.01.
2
Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.
Stat Sci. 2010;25(2):202-216. doi: 10.1214/10-STS332.
3
Calibration of prior variance in the Bayesian continual reassessment method.
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 30;30(17):2081-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.4139. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
5
Model calibration in the continual reassessment method.
Clin Trials. 2009 Jun;6(3):227-38. doi: 10.1177/1740774509105076.
6
Bivariate isotonic design for dose-finding with ordered groups.
Stat Med. 2006 Jun 30;25(12):2018-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.2312.
7
Continual reassessment method for ordered groups.
Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):430-40. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00050.
8
A simple technique to evaluate model sensitivity in the continual reassessment method.
Biometrics. 2002 Sep;58(3):671-4. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00671.x.
10
Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.
Biometrics. 1989 Sep;45(3):925-37.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验