• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心建立或改革生物统计学核心的十项基本实践。

Ten Essential Practices for Developing or Reforming a Biostatistics Core for a NCI Designated Cancer Center.

作者信息

Mazumdar Madhu, Moshier Erin L, Özbek Umut, Parsons Ramon

机构信息

Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY.

Center for Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

出版信息

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Apr 28;2(1):pky010. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky010. eCollection 2018 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/jncics/pky010
PMID:31360841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6649702/
Abstract

There are 69 National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated Cancer Centers (CCs) in the United States. Biostatistical collaboration is pivotal in cancer research, and support for a cancer biostatistics shared resource facility (C-BSRF) is included in the award. Although the services and staff needed in a C-BSRF have been outlined in general terms and best practices for biostatistical consultations and collaboration in an academic health center have been agreed upon, implementing these practices in the demanding setting of cancer centers interested in pursuing or maintaining NCI designation remains challenging. We surveyed all C-BSRF websites to assess their organizational charts, governance, size, services provided, and financial models and have identified 10 essential practices for the development of a successful C-BSRF. Here, we share our success with, and barriers to, implementation of these practices. Showcasing development plans for these essential practices resulted in an NCI score of "Excellent to Outstanding" for our C-BSRF in 2015, and performance metrics in 2016-2017 demonstrated notable improvement since our original Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) application in 2014. We believe that the essential practices described here can be adapted and adjusted, as needed, for CCs of various sizes and with different types of cancer research programs.

摘要

美国有69家由国立癌症研究所(NCI)指定的癌症中心。生物统计学合作在癌症研究中至关重要,该奖项包含对癌症生物统计学共享资源设施(C-BSRF)的支持。尽管C-BSRF所需的服务和人员已大致列出,且学术健康中心生物统计学咨询与合作的最佳实践也已达成共识,但在有意追求或维持NCI指定资格的癌症中心这种要求苛刻的环境中实施这些实践仍具有挑战性。我们对所有C-BSRF网站进行了调查,以评估其组织结构图、治理情况、规模、提供的服务以及财务模式,并确定了成功建立C-BSRF的10项基本实践。在此,我们分享实施这些实践的成功经验和遇到的障碍。展示这些基本实践的发展计划使我们的C-BSRF在2015年获得了NCI的“优秀到杰出”评分,并且2016 - 2017年的绩效指标显示,自2014年我们最初提交癌症中心支持资助(CCSG)申请以来有了显著改善。我们相信,这里描述的基本实践可根据需要进行调整,以适用于各种规模以及有着不同类型癌症研究项目的癌症中心。

相似文献

1
Ten Essential Practices for Developing or Reforming a Biostatistics Core for a NCI Designated Cancer Center.为国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心建立或改革生物统计学核心的十项基本实践。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Apr 28;2(1):pky010. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky010. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
3
The role of community outreach and engagement in evaluation of NCI Cancer Center Support Grants.社区外展和参与在 NCI 癌症中心支持拨款评估中的作用。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Jan;35(1):73-75. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01770-3. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
Are NCI Cancer Centers Providing Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer Focused Clinical Services? A National Survey.美国国立癌症研究所的癌症中心是否为青少年和青年癌症患者提供针对性临床服务?一项全国性调查。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 May;21(5):487-495.e15. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7001.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Comparison of Hospitals Affiliated With PPS-Exempt Cancer Centers, Other Hospitals Affiliated With NCI-Designated Cancer Centers, and Other Hospitals That Provide Cancer Care.与PPS豁免癌症中心相关的医院、其他与美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心相关的医院以及其他提供癌症护理的医院的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Aug 1;179(8):1043-1051. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0914.
7
Blood cancer survivorship in NCI-Designated Cancer Centers: a study of services, gaps, and access barriers.NCI 指定癌症中心的血液癌幸存者服务:一项服务、差距和准入障碍的研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Feb;14(1):43-47. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00823-4. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
8
Availability of Male and Female Sexual Health and Fertility Information on National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center Websites.美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心网站上男性和女性性健康与生育信息的可获取情况。
Sex Med. 2020 Jun;8(2):315-317. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
9
Differences in patients, surgical complexity, and outcomes after cancer surgery at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers compared to other hospitals.癌症手术患者、手术复杂性和结果的差异:美国国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心与其他医院的比较。
Med Care. 2013 Jul;51(7):606-13. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182928f44.
10
Impact of access to NCI- and NCCN-designated cancer centers on outcomes for multiple myeloma patients: A SEER registry analysis.获得美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)和美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指定癌症中心对多发性骨髓瘤患者预后的影响:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记分析
Cancer. 2016 Feb 15;122(4):618-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29771. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Needles in a Haystack: Finding Qualitative and Quantitative Collaborators in Academic Medical Centers.《大海捞针:在学术医疗中心寻找定性和定量合作者》。
Acad Med. 2023 Aug 1;98(8):889-895. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005212. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Statistical advising: Professional development opportunities for the biostatistician.统计咨询:生物统计学家的职业发展机会。
Stat Med. 2022 Feb 28;41(5):847-859. doi: 10.1002/sim.9290.
3
Incorporating professional recommendations into a graduate-level statistical consulting laboratory: A case study.将专业建议融入研究生水平的统计咨询实验室:一个案例研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Aug 25;5(1):e62. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.527.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for Success: Early-Stage Collaborating Biostatistics Faculty in an Academic Health Center.成功策略:学术健康中心的早期合作生物统计学教员
Am Stat. 2017;71(3):220-230. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1277157. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Modeling the causal effect of treatment initiation time on survival: Application to HIV/TB co-infection.模拟治疗开始时间对生存的因果效应:在艾滋病毒/结核病合并感染中的应用。
Biometrics. 2018 Jun;74(2):703-713. doi: 10.1111/biom.12780. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
3
A comparison of statistical methods for the study of etiologic heterogeneity.病因异质性研究中统计方法的比较
Stat Med. 2017 Nov 10;36(25):4050-4060. doi: 10.1002/sim.7405. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
Predictors of Positive Margins After Definitive Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Impact of Adjuvant Therapies.胃腺癌根治性切除术后切缘阳性的预测因素及辅助治疗的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Aug 1;98(5):1106-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.041. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Mixture models for undiagnosed prevalent disease and interval-censored incident disease: applications to a cohort assembled from electronic health records.未诊断的流行疾病和区间删失发病疾病的混合模型:应用于从电子健康记录中汇集的队列研究
Stat Med. 2017 Sep 30;36(22):3583-3595. doi: 10.1002/sim.7380. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
BOP2: Bayesian optimal design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complex endpoints.BOP2:用于具有简单和复杂终点的II期临床试验的贝叶斯最优设计
Stat Med. 2017 Sep 20;36(21):3302-3314. doi: 10.1002/sim.7338. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
7
Preoperative vs postoperative radiation therapy in localized soft tissue sarcoma: Nationwide patterns of care and trends in utilization.局部软组织肉瘤的术前与术后放疗:全国范围内的治疗模式和应用趋势。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):e507-e516. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Impact of correlation of predictors on discrimination of risk models in development and external populations.预测因子相关性对风险模型在开发人群和外部人群中区分能力的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 19;17(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0345-1.
9
QRank: a novel quantile regression tool for eQTL discovery.QRank:一种用于 eQTL 发现的新型分位数回归工具。
Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 15;33(14):2123-2130. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx119.
10
Estimation of treatment effect in two-stage confirmatory oncology trials of personalized medicines.个性化药物两阶段确证性肿瘤学试验中治疗效果的评估。
Stat Med. 2017 May 30;36(12):1843-1861. doi: 10.1002/sim.7272. Epub 2017 Mar 17.