Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-3013; email:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:291-315. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
There has been a surge in interest in and research on narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Despite or because of this increased attention, there are several areas of substantial debate that surround the construct, including descriptions of grandiose and vulnerable dimensions or variants, questions regarding the existence of a consensual description, central versus peripheral features of narcissism, distinctions between normal and pathological narcissism, possible etiological factors, the role of self-esteem in narcissism, where narcissism should be studied, how it can be assessed, and its representation in diagnostic nosologies. We suggest that a failure to distinguish between grandiose (i.e., overtly immodest, self-centered, entitled, domineering) and vulnerable (e.g., self-centered, distrustful, neurotic, introverted) presentations of narcissism has led to a less cohesive and coherent literature and that trait-based models of personality and personality disorder can bring greater clarity to many of these important debates.
自恋和自恋型人格障碍(NPD)的研究和兴趣呈激增态势。尽管(或者因为)这种关注度的增加,围绕该结构存在几个存在较大争议的领域,包括对夸大和脆弱维度或变体的描述、对公认描述存在性的质疑、自恋的中心与边缘特征、正常与病态自恋的区别、可能的病因因素、自尊在自恋中的作用、自恋应该在哪里进行研究、如何评估以及在诊断分类中的表现。我们认为,未能区分自恋的夸大(即过于不谦虚、以自我为中心、有特权、专横)和脆弱(例如,以自我为中心、不信任、神经质、内向)表现,导致文献的一致性和连贯性较差,而基于特质的人格和人格障碍模型可以为许多这些重要的争论带来更大的清晰度。