• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当卷曲乳杆菌或惰性乳杆菌在孕妇阴道微生物群中占主导地位时,孕妇上皮细胞和阴道分泌物的特性

Properties of Epithelial Cells and Vaginal Secretions in Pregnant Women When Lactobacillus crispatus or Lactobacillus iners Dominate the Vaginal Microbiome.

作者信息

Leizer Julie, Nasioudis Dimitrios, Forney Larry J, Schneider G Maria, Gliniewicz Karol, Boester Allison, Witkin Steven S

机构信息

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, NY, USA.

2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Presbyterian Queens, Queens, NY, USA.

出版信息

Reprod Sci. 2018 Jun;25(6):854-860. doi: 10.1177/1933719117698583. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1177/1933719117698583
PMID:28301987
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine differences in properties of vaginal epithelial cells and the composition of vaginal secretions when Lactobacillus crispatus or Lactobacillus iners are numerically dominant in the vaginal microenvironment of pregnant women.

METHODS

The vaginal microbiomes of 157 first-trimester pregnant women were identified by classifying partial 16S gene sequences amplified from the V1 to V3 region of bacterial ribosomal 16S RNA genes. The extent of autophagy and cell stress in vaginal epithelial cells was determined by measuring the intracellular levels of p62 and the inducible 70-kDa heat shock protein (hsp70). Vaginal secretions were analyzed using a colorimetric assay for d- and l-lactic acid and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for matrix metalloproteinase 8, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, α-amylase, hyaluronan, calprotectin, S100A8, and extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN).

RESULTS

L. crispatus was dominant in 69 (43.9%) women, while L iners dominated in 23 (14.6%) women. The median epithelial p62 levels were 0.41 and 4.26 ng/mL in women with L crispatus or L iners dominance, respectively ( P = .0035). The corresponding median hsp70 levels were 4.24 and 14.50 ng/mL, respectively ( P < .0001). The d-lactic acid concentration in vaginal fluid was highest in association with L crispatus dominance, while all other vaginal fluid compounds except for EMMPRIN were highest when L iners was dominant ( P< .03).

CONCLUSION

Epithelial cells exhibit a higher level of autophagy, lower induction of stress-related hsp70, and release lower level of mediators when L crispatus is most abundant as compared to when L iners dominates the vaginal microbiota.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是确定在孕妇阴道微环境中卷曲乳杆菌或惰性乳杆菌在数量上占优势时,阴道上皮细胞特性和阴道分泌物组成的差异。

方法

通过对从细菌核糖体16S RNA基因的V1至V3区域扩增的部分16S基因序列进行分类,鉴定了157名孕早期孕妇的阴道微生物群。通过测量细胞内p62水平和诱导型70 kDa热休克蛋白(hsp70)来确定阴道上皮细胞中的自噬程度和细胞应激。使用比色法分析阴道分泌物中的d-和l-乳酸,并通过酶联免疫吸附测定法分析基质金属蛋白酶8、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白、α-淀粉酶、透明质酸、钙卫蛋白、S100A8和细胞外基质金属蛋白酶诱导剂(EMMPRIN)。

结果

卷曲乳杆菌在69名(43.9%)女性中占优势,而惰性乳杆菌在23名(14.6%)女性中占优势。在卷曲乳杆菌或惰性乳杆菌占优势的女性中,上皮细胞p62水平的中位数分别为0.41和4.26 ng/mL(P = .0035)。相应的hsp70水平中位数分别为4.24和14.50 ng/mL(P < .0001)。与卷曲乳杆菌占优势相关时,阴道液中的d-乳酸浓度最高,而当惰性乳杆菌占优势时,除EMMPRIN外的所有其他阴道液化合物浓度最高(P< .03)。

结论

与惰性乳杆菌在阴道微生物群中占主导地位时相比,当卷曲乳杆菌最为丰富时,上皮细胞表现出更高水平的自噬、更低的应激相关hsp70诱导以及更低水平的介质释放。

相似文献

1
Properties of Epithelial Cells and Vaginal Secretions in Pregnant Women When Lactobacillus crispatus or Lactobacillus iners Dominate the Vaginal Microbiome.当卷曲乳杆菌或惰性乳杆菌在孕妇阴道微生物群中占主导地位时,孕妇上皮细胞和阴道分泌物的特性
Reprod Sci. 2018 Jun;25(6):854-860. doi: 10.1177/1933719117698583. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
2
The composition of the vaginal microbiome in first trimester pregnant women influences the level of autophagy and stress in vaginal epithelial cells.孕妇阴道微生物组在妊娠早期的组成影响阴道上皮细胞的自噬和应激水平。
J Reprod Immunol. 2017 Sep;123:35-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
Epigenetics and the vaginal microbiome: influence of the microbiota on the histone deacetylase level in vaginal epithelial cells from pregnant women.表观遗传学与阴道微生物群:微生物群对孕妇阴道上皮细胞中组蛋白脱乙酰酶水平的影响。
Minerva Ginecol. 2019 Apr;71(2):171-175. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04322-8. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
4
Influence of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Gardnerella vaginalis on bacterial vaginal composition in pregnant women.脆拟杆菌、惰性乳杆菌和阴道加德纳菌对孕妇阴道细菌组成的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Aug;304(2):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-05978-z. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Group B streptococcus alters properties of vaginal epithelial cells in pregnant women.B 组链球菌改变孕妇阴道上皮细胞的特性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):383.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.053.
6
Vaginal Biomarkers That Predict Cervical Length and Dominant Bacteria in the Vaginal Microbiomes of Pregnant Women.预测孕妇宫颈长度和阴道微生物组优势菌的阴道生物标志物。
mBio. 2019 Oct 22;10(5):e02242-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02242-19.
7
Associations between the vaginal microbiome and Candida colonization in women of reproductive age.育龄妇女阴道微生物群与假丝酵母菌定植的相关性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):471.e1-471.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
8
Unique Insights in the Cervicovaginal Lactobacillus iners and L. crispatus Proteomes and Their Associations with Microbiota Dysbiosis.阴道惰性乳杆菌和卷曲乳杆菌蛋白质组的独特见解及其与微生物群失调的关联。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0150767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150767. eCollection 2016.
9
Genomic Comparisons of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners Reveal Potential Ecological Drivers of Community Composition in the Vagina.卷曲乳杆菌和惰性乳杆菌的基因组比较揭示了阴道群落组成的潜在生态驱动因素。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Nov 21;82(24):7063-7073. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02385-16. Print 2016 Dec 15.
10
Group B vaginal colonisation throughout pregnancy is associated with decreased and increased abundance in the vaginal microbial community.妊娠期间 B 组阴道定植与阴道微生物群落中的丰度减少和增加有关。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Sep 30;14:1435745. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1435745. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaginal microbiota: different roles of lactobacilli and community instability in chronic vulvovaginal discomfort.阴道微生物群:乳酸杆菌的不同作用及群落不稳定在慢性外阴阴道不适中的影响
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Aug 18;15:1636873. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1636873. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring the vaginal ecosystem: insights into host-microbe interactions and microbial community dynamics.探索阴道生态系统:洞悉宿主与微生物的相互作用及微生物群落动态
Infect Immun. 2025 Sep 9;93(9):e0049924. doi: 10.1128/iai.00499-24. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
3
Cervicovaginal Microbiome: Physiology, Age-Related Changes, and Protective Role Against Human Papillomavirus Infection.
宫颈阴道微生物群:生理学、年龄相关变化以及对人乳头瘤病毒感染的保护作用
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 24;14(5):1521. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051521.
4
The Role of the Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiomes in Infertility and Their Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes in Light of Recent Literature.鉴于近期文献,阴道和子宫内膜微生物群在不孕症中的作用及其对妊娠结局的影响
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 9;25(23):13227. doi: 10.3390/ijms252313227.
5
Vulvovaginitis in pregnant women.孕妇外阴阴道炎。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Apr 2;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024FPS03. eCollection 2024.
6
as probiotics: opportunities and challenges for potential benefits in female reproductive health.作为益生菌:对女性生殖健康潜在益处的机遇与挑战
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):720-729. doi: 10.62347/IGWR5474. eCollection 2024.
7
A Narrative Review Discussing the Obstetric Repercussions Due to Alterations of Personalized Bacterial Sites Developed within the Vagina, Cervix, and Endometrium.一篇叙述性综述:探讨因阴道、宫颈和子宫内膜内个性化细菌群落改变而产生的产科影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 1;12(15):5069. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155069.
8
Female reproductive tract microbiome and early miscarriages.女性生殖道微生物组与早期流产。
APMIS. 2023 Feb;131(2):61-76. doi: 10.1111/apm.13288. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
9
Longitudinal study of the vaginal microbiome in pregnancies involving preterm labor.涉及早产的妊娠中阴道微生物群的纵向研究。
Fujita Med J. 2022 Aug;8(3):96-101. doi: 10.20407/fmj.2021-017. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
10
The antimicrobial activity of zinc against group B Streptococcus is strain-dependent across diverse sequence types, capsular serotypes, and invasive versus colonizing isolates.锌对 B 群链球菌的抗菌活性因不同序列型、荚膜血清型以及侵袭性与定植性分离株的差异而有所不同。
BMC Microbiol. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02428-3.