• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临界功率测试或自行选择的骑行:哪一个是最大代谢稳态的最佳预测指标?

Critical power testing or self-selected cycling: Which one is the best predictor of maximal metabolic steady-state?

作者信息

Mattioni Maturana Felipe, Keir Daniel A, McLay Kaitlin M, Murias Juan M

机构信息

Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Canada.

School of Kinesiology, The University of Western Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Aug;20(8):795-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.023. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.023
PMID:28302463
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Critical power (CP) demarcates the boundary between heavy and very heavy exercise intensity domains, and therefore, the power output (PO) that can be sustained at the maximal metabolic steady-state during constant-PO exercise (i.e., maximal lactate steady-state (MLSS)). However, the estimated CP does not always reflect a sustainable intensity of exercise, where blood lactate concentration ([La]) and oxygen uptake (V˙O) reach a plateau.

OBJECTIVES

To test cyclists' ability to predict their highest PO associated with metabolic steady-state based on their own perception of effort.

DESIGN

Repeated measures.

METHODS

Thirteen healthy young cyclists (26±3years; 69.0±9.2kg; 174±10cm) were tested. Five time-to-exhaustion trials were used to derive CP based on a 2-parameter hyperbolic model (CP). Participants performed two 30-min rides at a self-selected PO that they considered their highest sustainable exercise intensity (CP). Additionally, MLSS was determined as the highest PO at which variation in [La] ≤1.0mmolL between the 10th and 30th min was observed during a 30-min ride.

RESULTS

Mean PO at CP (233±42W) was similar (p>0.05) to MLSS (233±41W), whereas CP (253±44W) consistently overestimated (p<0.05) the PO associated to metabolic steady-state. The limits of agreement (LOA) between MLSS and CP were -20 to +20W (bias=0W, p>0.05), whereas the LOA between CP and CP were -40 to 0W (bias=-20W, p<0.05). CP and MLSS presented similar (p>0.05) metabolic response (i.e., V˙O, [La], and HR).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to CP, CP may offer a more precise approach to predict the constant-PO associated with maximal physiological steady-state.

摘要

未标注

临界功率(CP)划分了重度和极重度运动强度域之间的界限,因此,它是在恒定功率输出(PO)运动期间(即最大乳酸稳态(MLSS))能够在最大代谢稳态下维持的功率输出。然而,估算的CP并不总是反映出血乳酸浓度([La])和摄氧量(V˙O)达到平台期时可持续的运动强度。

目的

测试自行车运动员基于自身用力感知来预测与代谢稳态相关的最高PO的能力。

设计

重复测量。

方法

对13名健康年轻自行车运动员(26±3岁;69.0±9.2千克;174±10厘米)进行测试。使用五次力竭时间试验,基于双参数双曲线模型得出CP(临界功率)。参与者以他们认为是自身最高可持续运动强度(CP)的自我选择的PO进行了两次30分钟骑行。此外,将MLSS确定为在30分钟骑行期间第10至30分钟内[La]变化≤1.0毫摩尔/升时的最高PO。

结果

CP时的平均PO(233±42瓦)与MLSS(233±41瓦)相似(p>0.05),而CP(253±44瓦)始终高估(p<0.0)与代谢稳态相关的PO。MLSS和CP之间的一致性界限(LOA)为-20至+20瓦(偏差=0瓦,p>0.05),而CP和CP之间的LOA为-40至0瓦(偏差=-20瓦,p<0.05)。CP和MLSS表现出相似(p>0.05)的代谢反应(即V˙O、[La]和心率)。

结论

与CP相比,CP可能为预测与最大生理稳态相关的恒定PO提供更精确的方法。

相似文献

1
Critical power testing or self-selected cycling: Which one is the best predictor of maximal metabolic steady-state?临界功率测试或自行选择的骑行:哪一个是最大代谢稳态的最佳预测指标?
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Aug;20(8):795-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.023. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
2
Can measures of critical power precisely estimate the maximal metabolic steady-state?临界功率指标能否精确估计最大代谢稳态?
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Nov;41(11):1197-1203. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0248.
3
Time to exhaustion during cycling is not well predicted by critical power calculations.在骑行过程中,达到力竭的时间不能很好地通过临界功率计算来预测。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Jul;45(7):753-760. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2019-0637. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
4
Correlations between lactate and ventilatory thresholds and the maximal lactate steady state in elite cyclists.精英自行车运动员中乳酸与通气阈值及最大乳酸稳态之间的相关性。
Int J Sports Med. 2004 Aug;25(6):403-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-819942.
5
Maximal lactate steady state, respiratory compensation threshold and critical power.最大乳酸稳态、呼吸补偿阈值和临界功率。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 May;89(3-4):281-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0786-y. Epub 2003 Mar 4.
6
Exercise Intensity Thresholds: Identifying the Boundaries of Sustainable Performance.运动强度阈值:确定可持续表现的界限。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Sep;47(9):1932-40. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000613.
7
Methodological Reconciliation of CP and MLSS and Their Agreement with the Maximal Metabolic Steady State.CP 和 MLSS 的方法学调和及其与最大代谢稳态的一致性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Apr 1;54(4):622-632. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002831.
8
Metabolic and performance-related consequences of exercising at and slightly above MLSS.在最大乳酸稳态和略高于最大乳酸稳态下运动的代谢和表现相关后果。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Dec;28(12):2481-2493. doi: 10.1111/sms.13280. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
9
Is the Functional Threshold Power Interchangeable With the Maximal Lactate Steady State in Trained Cyclists?训练有素的自行车运动员的功能阈功率是否可与最大乳酸稳态互换?
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Sep 1;14(8):1029-1035. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0572.
10
A "Step-Ramp-Step" Protocol to Identify the Maximal Metabolic Steady State.一种识别最大代谢稳态的“阶梯式递增”方案。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Sep;52(9):2011-2019. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002343.

引用本文的文献

1
The accuracy of fixed intensity anchors to estimate lactate thresholds in recreational runners.固定强度锚定法用于估计普通跑步者乳酸阈值的准确性。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05748-8.
2
Critical Power and Maximal Lactate Steady State in Cycling: "Watts" the Difference?自行车运动中的临界功率和最大乳酸稳态:“瓦特”有区别吗?
Sports Med. 2024 Oct;54(10):2497-2513. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02075-4. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
Identification of Non-Invasive Exercise Thresholds: Methods, Strategies, and an Online App.
无创运动阈值的识别:方法、策略及一款在线应用程序
Sports Med. 2022 Feb;52(2):237-255. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01581-z. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
Fitness Level and Not Aging , Determines the Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Response.决定摄氧量动力学反应的是体能水平而非衰老。
Front Physiol. 2018 Mar 29;9:277. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00277. eCollection 2018.