Suppr超能文献

家禽样本中[具体物质]定量的新方法:针对ISO标准平板计数法使用数字PCR和实时PCR技术

New Approaches on Quantification of in Poultry Samples: The Use of Digital PCR and Real-time PCR against the ISO Standard Plate Count Method.

作者信息

Papić Bojan, Pate Mateja, Henigman Urška, Zajc Urška, Gruntar Igor, Biasizzo Majda, Ocepek Matjaž, Kušar Darja

机构信息

Veterinary Faculty, Institute of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Ljubljana Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Veterinary Faculty, Institute of Food Safety, Feed and Environment, University of Ljubljana Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2017 Mar 2;8:331. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00331. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Campylobacteriosis is the most frequently reported bacterial food-borne illness in the European Union and contaminated broiler meat is considered the most important source of infection in humans. The aim of the present study was to evaluate real-time PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) for quantification of in 75 broiler neck-skin samples collected from a poultry slaughterhouse, and to compare them with the ISO 10272-2 standard plate count method. For qPCR standard curve, -negative neck-skin samples were spiked with suspension with a known number of bacterial cells. The observed CFU/g values by qPCR correlated greatly with the expected values and qPCR showed good performance with the reliable limit of detection (rLOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of three and 31 target copies per reaction, respectively. However, both rLOD (1219 CFU/g) and LOQ (12,523 CFU/g) were beyond the EFSA-proposed critical limit of 500-1,000 CFU/g of neck skin. Although cell counts were ≤1,000 CFU/g in only 7/75 samples by plate counting, they were ≤LOQ in 60/75 and ≤rLOD in 26/75 (≤1,000 CFU/g in 24/75) samples by qPCR. A strong and statistically significant correlation was observed between qPCR and dPCR. Both PCR-based methods correlated significantly with the plate count method; however, the correlation was moderate. Using the Bland-Altman analysis, an average agreement was noted between all three methods, although with a large standard deviation. A significant bias toward overestimation in dPCR was observed, probably due to the relatively high number of false positive calls. The linear dynamic range was comparable in both PCR-based methods; however, qPCR proved to be more suitable for routine use. In the future, the establishment of a reliable molecular quantification of in poultry samples showing a wide range of contamination levels down to the proposed critical limit is needed to enable time- and cost-effective surveillance throughout all stages in the food production chain. As both rLOD and LOQ were beyond this limit, a modification of the procedure is suggested to include less sample dilution prior to DNA extraction to enable PCR-based quantification of at the proposed microbiological criteria.

摘要

弯曲杆菌病是欧盟报告最频繁的细菌性食源性疾病,受污染的肉鸡被认为是人类最重要的感染源。本研究的目的是评估实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)和数字PCR(dPCR)对从家禽屠宰场采集的75份肉鸡颈部皮肤样本中的弯曲杆菌进行定量分析,并将其与ISO 10272-2标准平板计数法进行比较。对于qPCR标准曲线,将不含弯曲杆菌的颈部皮肤样本接种已知数量细菌细胞的弯曲杆菌悬液。通过qPCR观察到的每克菌落形成单位(CFU/g)值与预期值高度相关,qPCR表现良好,其可靠检测限(rLOD)和定量限(LOQ)分别为每个反应3个和31个目标拷贝。然而,rLOD(1219 CFU/g)和LOQ(12523 CFU/g)均超过了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)提出的颈部皮肤每克500 - 1000 CFU/g的临界限值。尽管通过平板计数法在75份样本中只有7份弯曲杆菌细胞计数≤1000 CFU/g,但通过qPCR法在75份样本中有60份≤LOQ,26份≤rLOD(24份≤1000 CFU/g)。观察到qPCR和dPCR之间存在强且具有统计学意义的相关性。两种基于PCR的方法与平板计数法均显著相关;然而,相关性为中等。使用布兰德 - 奥特曼分析,发现所有三种方法之间存在平均一致性,尽管标准差较大。观察到dPCR存在显著的高估偏差,可能是由于假阳性判定数量相对较多。两种基于PCR的方法的线性动态范围相当;然而,qPCR被证明更适合常规使用。未来,需要建立一种可靠的分子定量方法,用于对污染水平范围广泛直至提出的临界限值的家禽样本中的弯曲杆菌进行定量,以便在食品生产链的所有阶段进行具有时间和成本效益的监测。由于rLOD和LOQ均超出此限值,建议修改程序,在DNA提取前减少样本稀释,以便根据提出的微生物标准对弯曲杆菌进行基于PCR的定量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验