Boecker Werner, Stenman Göran, Schroeder Tina, Schumacher Udo, Loening Thomas, Stahnke Lisa, Löhnert Catharina, Siering Robert Michael, Kuper Arthur, Samoilova Vera, Tiemann Markus, Korsching Eberhard, Buchwalow Igor
Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University of Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Gerhard-Seifert Referenzzentrum, Papenreye 23, 22455, Hamburg, Germany.
Virchows Arch. 2017 May;470(5):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2073-7. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
We contend that knowledge about the cellular composition of normal breast epithelium is a prerequisite for understanding proliferative breast disease. Against this background, we used multicolor immunofluorescence to study normal breast epithelium and two types of intraepithelial proliferative breast lesion for expression of the p63, basal keratin K5, glandular keratin K8/18, SMA, ER-alpha, and Ki67. We studied eight normal breast epithelium samples, 12 cases of usual ductal hyperplasia, and 33 cases of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (9 flat epithelial atypia, 14 low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ and 10 cases of lobular neoplasia). Usual ductal hyperplasia showed striking similarity to normal luminal breast epithelium including p63+ and/or K5+ luminal progenitor cells and the full spectrum of luminal progeny cells. In normal breast epithelium and usual ductal hyperplasia, expression of ER-alpha was associated with lack of expression of the proliferation antigen Ki67. In contrast, we found in both types of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia robust expression of keratin K8/18 and a positive association between ER-alpha and Ki67 expression. However, these lesions were consistently negative for p63 and/or K5. Our observational study supports the view that usual ductal hyperplasia and low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia are different entities rather than part of a spectrum of the same disease. We propose a new operational model of cell differentiation that may serve to better understand correlations between normal breast epithelium and proliferative breast diseases. From our data we conclude that p63+ and/or K5+ progenitor cells contribute to maintenance of normal epithelium and usual ductal hyperplasia, but not to low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the breast.
我们认为,了解正常乳腺上皮细胞的组成是理解乳腺增生性疾病的先决条件。在此背景下,我们使用多色免疫荧光技术研究正常乳腺上皮以及两种乳腺上皮内增殖性病变中p63、基底角蛋白K5、腺性角蛋白K8/18、平滑肌肌动蛋白(SMA)、雌激素受体α(ER-α)和Ki67的表达情况。我们研究了8个正常乳腺上皮样本、12例普通导管增生以及33例低级别上皮内瘤变(9例扁平上皮异型增生、14例低级别导管原位癌和10例小叶瘤变)。普通导管增生与正常乳腺管腔上皮表现出显著相似性,包括p63阳性和/或K5阳性的管腔祖细胞以及完整谱系的管腔子代细胞。在正常乳腺上皮和普通导管增生中,ER-α的表达与增殖抗原Ki67的表达缺失相关。相比之下,我们在两种低级别上皮内瘤变中均发现角蛋白K8/18的强烈表达以及ER-α与Ki67表达之间的正相关。然而,这些病变的p63和/或K5始终为阴性。我们的观察性研究支持这样一种观点,即普通导管增生和低级别上皮内瘤变是不同的实体,而非同一疾病谱系的一部分。我们提出了一种新的细胞分化操作模型,这可能有助于更好地理解正常乳腺上皮与乳腺增生性疾病之间的相关性。根据我们的数据,我们得出结论,p63阳性和/或K5阳性的祖细胞有助于维持正常上皮和普通导管增生,但对乳腺低级别上皮内瘤变没有作用。