Institute for Hematopathology , Fangdieckstr. 75a, 22547 Hamburg, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2011;1:28. doi: 10.1038/srep00028. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
The current protocols for blocking background staining in immunohistochemistry are based on conflicting reports. Background staining is thought to occur as a result of either non-specific antibody (Ab) binding to endogenous Fc receptors (FcRs) or a combination of ionic and hydrophobic interactions. In this study, cell and tissue samples were processed according to routine protocols either with or without a blocking step (goat serum or BSA). Surprisingly, no Abs in samples processed without a blocking step showed any propensity for non-specific binding leading to background staining, implying that endogenous FcRs do not retain their ability to bind the Fc portion of Abs after standard fixation. Likewise, we did not find any non-specific Ab binding ascribable to either ionic or hydrophobic interactions. We determined that traditionally used protein blocking steps are unnecessary in the immunostaining of routinely fixed cell and tissue samples.
目前用于免疫组织化学阻断背景染色的方案基于相互矛盾的报告。背景染色被认为是由于非特异性抗体(Ab)与内源性 Fc 受体(FcR)结合,或者离子和疏水相互作用的结合而产生的。在这项研究中,细胞和组织样本根据常规方案进行处理,要么有阻断步骤(羊血清或 BSA),要么没有阻断步骤。令人惊讶的是,没有任何 Abs 在没有阻断步骤的情况下表现出任何非特异性结合导致背景染色的倾向,这意味着内源性 FcR 在标准固定后不会保留与 Abs 的 Fc 部分结合的能力。同样,我们也没有发现任何可归因于离子或疏水相互作用的非特异性 Ab 结合。我们确定,在常规固定的细胞和组织样本的免疫染色中,传统上使用的蛋白质阻断步骤是不必要的。