Koivisto Juha, van Eijnatten Maureen, Järnstedt Jorma, Holli-Helenius Kirsi, Dastidar Prasun, Wolff Jan
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology and 3D Innovation Lab, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
2 Medical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Aug;46(6):20160418. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160418. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
To assess the impact of supine, prone and oblique patient imaging positions on the image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and figure of merit (FOM) value in the maxillofacial region using a CBCT scanner. Furthermore, the CBCT supine images were compared with supine multislice CT (MSCT) images.
One fresh frozen cadaver head was scanned in prone, supine and oblique imaging positions using a mobile CBCT scanner. MSCT images of the head were acquired in a supine position. Two radiologists graded the CBCT and MSCT images at ten different anatomical sites according to their image quality using a six-point scale. The CNR and FOM values were calculated at two different anatomical sites on the CBCT and MSCT images.
The best image quality was achieved in the prone imaging position for sinus, mandible and maxilla, followed by the supine and oblique imaging positions. 12-mA prone images presented high delineation scores for all anatomical landmarks, except for the ear region (carotid canal), which presented adequate to poor delineation scores for all studied head positions and exposure parameters. The MSCT scanner offered similar image qualities to the 7.5-mA supine images acquired using the mobile CBCT scanner. The prone imaging position offered the best CNR and FOM values on the mobile CBCT scanner.
Head positioning has an impact on CBCT image quality. The best CBCT image quality can be achieved using the prone and supine imaging positions. The oblique imaging position offers inadequate image quality except in the sinus region.
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描仪评估仰卧位、俯卧位和斜位患者成像体位对颌面部区域图像质量、对比噪声比(CNR)和品质因数(FOM)值的影响。此外,将CBCT仰卧位图像与仰卧位多层螺旋CT(MSCT)图像进行比较。
使用移动CBCT扫描仪对一个新鲜冷冻尸体头部进行俯卧位、仰卧位和斜位成像扫描。头部的MSCT图像在仰卧位采集。两名放射科医生根据图像质量,使用六点量表对CBCT和MSCT图像在十个不同解剖部位进行分级。在CBCT和MSCT图像上的两个不同解剖部位计算CNR和FOM值。
鼻窦、下颌骨和上颌骨在俯卧位成像时图像质量最佳,其次是仰卧位和斜位成像。12毫安俯卧位图像对所有解剖标志的清晰度评分都很高,但耳部区域(颈动脉管)除外,该区域在所有研究的头部体位和曝光参数下的清晰度评分均为足够至较差。MSCT扫描仪提供的图像质量与使用移动CBCT扫描仪采集的7.5毫安仰卧位图像相似。在移动CBCT扫描仪上,俯卧位成像体位的CNR和FOM值最佳。
头部体位对CBCT图像质量有影响。使用俯卧位和仰卧位成像体位可获得最佳的CBCT图像质量。除鼻窦区域外,斜位成像体位的图像质量不足。