Caldwell Martyn M, Manwaring John H, Durham Susan L
Department of Rangeland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, 84322-5230, Logan, UT, USA.
Fisheries and Wildife Department, Utah State University, 84322-5210, Logan, UT, USA.
Oecologia. 1996 Jun;106(4):440-447. doi: 10.1007/BF00329699.
Interference at the level of fine roots in the field was studied by detailed examination of fine root distribution in small soil patches. To capture roots as they occur in natural three-dimensional soil space, we used a freezing and slicing technique for microscale root mapping. The location of individual roots intersecting a sliced soil core surface was digitized and the identity of shrub and grass roots was established by a chemical technique. Soil patches were created midway between the shrub, Artemisia tridentata, and one of two tussock grasses, Pseudoroegneria spicata or Agropyron desertorum. Some soil patches were enriched with nutrients and others given only deionized water (control); in addition, patches were located between plants of different size combination (large shrubs with small tussock grasses and small shrubs with large tussock grasses). The abundance of shrub and grass roots sharing soil patches and the inter-root distances of individual fine roots were measured. Total average rooting density in patches varied among these different treatment combinations by only a factor of 2, but the proportion of shrub and grass roots in the patches varied sixfold. For the shrub, the species of grass roots sharing the patches had a pronounced influence on shrub root density; shrub roots were more abundant if the patch was shared with Pseudoroegneria roots than if shared with Agropyron roots. The relative size of plants whose roots shared the soil patches also influenced the proportion of shrub and grass roots; larger plants were able to place more roots in the patches than were the smaller plants. In the nutrient-enriched patches, these influences of grass species and size combination were amplified. At the millimeter- to centimeter-scale within patches, shrub and grass roots tended to segregate, i.e., avoid each other, based on nearest-neighbor distances. At this scale, there was no indication that the species-specific interactions were the result of resource competition, since there were no obvious patterns between the proportion of shrub and grass roots of the two species combinations with microsite nutrient concentrations. Other potential mechanisms are discussed. Interference at the fine-root level, and its species-specific character, is likely an influential component of competitive success, but one that is not easily assessed.
通过详细检查小土壤斑块中的细根分布,研究了田间细根水平的干扰情况。为了捕捉自然三维土壤空间中出现的根系,我们使用了一种冷冻切片技术进行微观尺度的根系测绘。将与切片土壤核心表面相交的单根位置数字化,并通过化学技术确定灌木和草根系的身份。在三齿蒿(Artemisia tridentata)与两种丛生禾本科植物之一,即穗状伪鹅观草(Pseudoroegneria spicata)或沙生冰草(Agropyron desertorum)之间的中间位置创建土壤斑块。一些土壤斑块富含养分,另一些只给予去离子水(对照);此外,斑块位于不同大小组合的植物之间(大灌木与小丛生禾本科植物以及小灌木与大丛生禾本科植物)。测量了共享土壤斑块的灌木和草根系的丰度以及单个细根之间的根间距。这些不同处理组合下斑块中的总平均生根密度仅相差两倍,但斑块中灌木和草根系的比例相差六倍。对于灌木来说,共享斑块的草根系物种对灌木根系密度有显著影响;如果斑块与伪鹅观草根系共享,灌木根系比与沙生冰草根系共享时更为丰富。共享土壤斑块的植物的相对大小也影响灌木和草根系的比例;较大的植物比较小的植物能够在斑块中放置更多的根系。在富含养分的斑块中,草种和大小组合的这些影响会被放大。在斑块内毫米到厘米尺度上,基于最近邻距离,灌木和草根系倾向于分离,即相互避开。在这个尺度上,没有迹象表明物种特异性相互作用是资源竞争的结果,因为两种物种组合的灌木和草根系比例与微生境养分浓度之间没有明显模式。讨论了其他潜在机制。细根水平的干扰及其物种特异性特征可能是竞争成功的一个有影响的组成部分,但这是一个不易评估的部分。