Caldwell M M, Richards J H, Johnson D A, Nowak R S, Dzurec R S
Department of Range Science, Utah State University, 84322, Logan, Utah, USA.
the Ecology Center, UMC 52, Utah State University, 84322, Logan, Utah, USA.
Oecologia. 1981 Aug;50(1):14-24. doi: 10.1007/BF00378790.
Agropyron desertorum, a grazing-tolerant bunchgrass introduced to the western U.S. from Eurasia, and Agropyron spicatum, a grazing-sensitive bunchgrass native to North America, were examined in the field for photosynthetic capacity, growth, resource allocation, and tiller dynamics. These observations allowed identification of physiological characteristics that may contribute to grazing tolerance in semiarid environments. A uniform matrix of sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata, provided an ecologically relevant competitive environment for both bunch-grass species. Physiological activity, growth, and allocation were also followed during recovery from a severe defoliation treatment and were correlated with tiller dynamics.Potential photosynthetic carbon uptake of both species was dominated by stems and leaf sheaths during June, when maximum uptake rates occurred. For both species, water use efficiency of stems and sheaths was similar to that of leaf blades, but nitrogen investment per photosynthetic surface area was less than in blades. In addition, soluble carbohydrates in stems and sheaths of both species constituted the major labile carbon pools in control plants. Contrary to current theory, these findings suggest that culms from which leaf blades have been removed should be of considerable value to defoliated bunchgrasses, and in the case of partial defoliation could provide important supplies of organic nutrients for regrowth. These interpretations, based on total pool sizes, differ markedly from previous interpretations based on carbohydrate concentrations alone, which suggested that crowns contain large carbohydrate reserves. In this study, crowns of both species contained a minor component of the total plant carbohydrate pool.Following defoliation, A. desertorum plants rapidly reestablished a canopy with 3 to 5 times the photosynthetic surface of A. spicatum plants. This difference was primarily due to the greater number of quickly growing new tillers produced following defoliation. Agropyron spicatum produced few new tillers following defoliation despite adequate moisture, and carbohydrate pools that were equivalent to those in A. desertorum.Leaf blades of regrowing tillers had higher photosynthetic capacity than blades on unclipped plants of both species, but the relative increase, considered on a unit mass, area, or nitrogen basis, was greater for A. desertorum than for A. spicatum. Agropyron desertorum also had lower investment of nitrogen and biomass per unit area of photosynthetic tissues, more tillers and leaves per bunch, and shorter lived stems, all of which can contribute to greater tolerance of partial defoliation.Greater flexibility of resource allocation following defoliation was demonstrated by A. desertorum for both nitrogen and carbohydrates. Relatively more allocation to the shoot system and curtailed root growth in A. desertorum resulted in more rapid approach to the preclipping balance between the root and shoot systems, whereas root growth in A. spicatum continued unabated following defoliation. Nitrogen required for regrowth in both species was apparently supplied by uptake rather than reserve depletion. Carbohydrate pools in the shoot system of both species remained very low following severe defoliation and were approximately equivalent to carbon fixed in one day by photosynthesis of the whole canopy.
沙生冰草是一种从欧亚大陆引入美国西部的耐牧丛生禾本科植物,穗状冰草是一种原产于北美的对放牧敏感的丛生禾本科植物,研究人员在野外对它们的光合能力、生长、资源分配和分蘖动态进行了考察。这些观察结果有助于确定可能有助于在半干旱环境中耐牧的生理特征。由三齿蒿构成的均匀基质为这两种丛生禾本科植物提供了一个具有生态相关性的竞争环境。在从严重去叶处理中恢复的过程中,还对生理活动、生长和分配情况进行了跟踪,并将其与分蘖动态相关联。6月,当光合速率达到最大值时,两种植物潜在的光合碳吸收均以茎和叶鞘为主。对于这两个物种来说,茎和叶鞘的水分利用效率与叶片相似,但单位光合表面积的氮素投入低于叶片。此外,两种植物茎和叶鞘中的可溶性碳水化合物构成了对照植物中主要的不稳定碳库。与当前理论相反,这些发现表明,去除叶片后的茎干对去叶的丛生禾本科植物具有相当大的价值,在部分去叶的情况下,可为再生提供重要的有机养分供应。基于总库大小的这些解释与之前仅基于碳水化合物浓度的解释明显不同,之前的解释认为冠部含有大量的碳水化合物储备。在本研究中,两个物种的冠部在植物总碳水化合物库中所占比例较小。去叶后,沙生冰草植株迅速重新建立了一个冠层,其光合表面积是穗状冰草植株的3至5倍。这种差异主要是由于去叶后产生的快速生长的新分蘖数量更多。尽管水分充足,但穗状冰草去叶后产生的新分蘖很少,其碳水化合物库与沙生冰草相当。再生分蘖的叶片比两个物种未修剪植株的叶片具有更高的光合能力,但以单位质量、面积或氮为基础计算的相对增加量,沙生冰草比穗状冰草更大。沙生冰草在单位面积光合组织上的氮和生物量投入也较低,每丛的分蘖和叶片更多,茎的寿命更短,所有这些都有助于提高对部分去叶的耐受性。沙生冰草在去叶后对氮和碳水化合物的资源分配具有更大的灵活性。沙生冰草相对更多地分配到地上部分系统,根系生长受到抑制,导致其更快地恢复到去叶前地上和地下系统之间的平衡状态,而穗状冰草去叶后根系生长仍未减弱。两个物种再生所需的氮显然是通过吸收供应的,而不是储备消耗。严重去叶后,两个物种地上部分系统中的碳水化合物库仍然非常低,大约相当于整个冠层一天光合作用固定的碳量。