Renhorn K-E, Esseen Per-Anders, Palmqvist Kristin, Sundberg Bodil
Department of Ecological Botany, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden fax: +46 90 16 66 91; e-mail:
Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden, , , , , , SE.
Oecologia. 1996 Dec;109(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s004420050051.
We tested the hypothesis that changed microclimate at induced forest edges causes reduced growth of epiphytic lichens. Two foliose, green algal lichens were transplanted to the lower canopy of a mature Picea abies forest at six distances (2, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 m) from a clearcut. The biomass growth in Platismatia glauca (6.2% in 16 months) was 41% higher than in Lobaria pulmonaria (4.4%). We found no growth reduction near the forest edge. In contrast, the highest growth in both species occurred within 12 m from the edge. Further, fluorescence and chlorophyll measurements showed that lichen vitality was unaffected by distance from edge. The light intensity was 4.3 times higher at the edge than in the interior during the growing season, but there were only minor differences in air temperature and relative humidity. Monitoring of thallus water content revealed clear differences in both number and length of wetting and drying cycles. However, the total time with water content sufficient for photosynthetic activity was only slightly higher at the edge. The data thus indicate that our gradient in microclimate was too small to significantly affect lichen growth, and that lichens are largely metabolically inactive when large edge-interior contrasts in microclimate occur. Lichen response to forest edge microclimate results from intricate interactions among several biotic and abiotic factors. Linking data on lichen growth, microclimate and thallus water content with physiological measurements provides a framework for future studies of the mechanisms behind abiotic edge effects.
人工诱导形成的森林边缘处微气候的变化会导致附生地衣生长减缓。将两种叶状绿藻地衣移植到一片成熟欧洲云杉林下层树冠,距离皆伐地分别为六个不同距离(2、6.25、12.5、25、50和100米)。绿盘衣(16个月内增长6.2%)的生物量增长比肺衣(4.4%)高出41%。我们发现在森林边缘附近地衣生长并未减缓。相反,两个物种在距离边缘12米范围内生长最快。此外,荧光和叶绿素测量结果表明,地衣活力不受与边缘距离的影响。生长季节边缘处的光照强度比林内高4.3倍,但气温和相对湿度只有细微差异。对叶状体含水量的监测揭示了湿润和干燥循环在次数和时长上的明显差异。然而,边缘处含水量足以支持光合作用的总时长仅略高于林内。因此,数据表明我们设置的微气候梯度过小,无法显著影响地衣生长,并且当微气候在边缘与内部存在较大差异时,地衣在很大程度上代谢不活跃。地衣对森林边缘微气候的响应是由多种生物和非生物因素之间复杂的相互作用导致的。将地衣生长、微气候和叶状体含水量的数据与生理测量结果相结合,为未来研究非生物边缘效应背后的机制提供了一个框架。