Rürk R, Wirth V, Lange O L
Botanisches Institut II der Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Bundesrepublick Deutschland.
Oecologia. 1974 Mar;15(1):33-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00345227.
The SO resistance of 12 lichen species with different growth forms and taken from different sites was investigated. The thalli were either exposed to different concentrations of SO gas (concentration at entry into the cuvette: 0.5; 1.0; 2.0 and 4.0 mg SO/m air) or treated with NaSO solutions of differing concentration and pH. As a viability criterion the CO exchange of the thalli was measured with an infrared gas analyzer before and immediately after SO exposure and subsequently at intervals of several weeks. In some cases the chlorophyll content was also determined. 1. Species-specific differences were clearly apparent in the SO gas-exposure experiments. The influence of SO on net photosynthesis and dark respiration in the most sensitive species was detectable after exposure to 0.5 mg SO/m for 14 h in a fully hydrated state. The photosynthetic intensity of Lobaria pulmonaria was actually irreversibly damaged. In contrast, the most resistant species survived a treatment with 4 mg SO/m for the same length of time with little or no permanent impairment of their CO exchange. The reaction of the lichen species investigated to the above treatment allows us to arrange them in decreasing order of resistance: Xanthoria parietina (most resistant), Parmelia scortea, Parmelia acetabulum, Hypogymnia physodes, Parmelia saxatilis, Platismatia glauca, Labaria pumonaria, Parmelia stenophylla, Evernia prunastri. The most sensitive species, Evernia prunastri, is characteristically a fruticose lichen. Lichens with this growth form are known from field studies to be especially sensitive. 2. Examples of the same species (Parmelia saxatilis, Lobaria pulmonaria) can vary in their SO resistance according to their growing site. Morphological and anatomical characteristics (thallus and cortex thickness) may cause these differences. 3. The sensitivity of the lichens to SO is closely dependent upon their moisture status. When the water potential is lowered the SO uptake is reduced and with it the injury. Dried thalli survive high SO concentrations in their surroundings without damage. 4. The treatment with NaSO solutions also brought out species-specific differences in lichen resistance. However, the sequence of decreasing resistance is not the same as that to SO gas treatment. Irreversible damage of photosynthesis is not necessarily correlated with destruction of chlorophyll. 5. The damage caused to the lichens by the NaSO solutions (of the same concentration) is closely dependent upon the pH of the medium. At a low pH the effect is much more pronounced than at a high pH. This can be interpreted as due to the concentration of damaging ions, which changes according to the degree of dissociation of the solution; this is pH dependent. The results are discussed on the basis of Levitt's resistance concept that the total resistance of lichens to SO in the air is dependent upon two components, "avoidance" and "tolerance" (see Fig. 15). Resistance to a specific SO concentration in the air depends upon how much SO is taken up by the thallus, which is conditioned among other things by thallus organization (life form, surface characteristics) and by the degree of hydration of the poikilohydric organism. The toxicity of the SO taken up by the lichen can also be reduced; the pH of the thallus and its buffering capacity (dependent among other things upon site and substrate) play a dominant role in this process. In addition to these "avoidance" factors the total resistance of lichens is also dependent upon the plasmatic resistance of sensitive systems to SO ("tolerance"). This type of resistance, due to the influence of NaSO solution, is subject to considerable deviation (for example due to the developmental state of the lichen). The differences in the sequence of resistance for the investigated lichen species in terms of total resistance (SO treatment) and plasmatic resistance (NaSO solution treatment) show the significance of the "avoidance" component for the total resistance of the organisms.In ecological terms the investigation supports the view that lichens are highly sensitive to SO, even in concentrations which occur due to real immisions. The study also shows the complexity of an ecological interpretation of experimentally determined resistance phenomena.
研究了取自不同地点、具有不同生长形式的12种地衣物种的抗二氧化硫(SO)能力。地衣体要么暴露于不同浓度的SO气体(进入比色皿时的浓度:0.5、1.0、2.0和4.0毫克SO/立方米空气),要么用不同浓度和pH值的NaSO溶液处理。作为活力标准,在SO暴露之前、刚暴露之后以及随后几周的间隔时间,用地衣体的CO交换通过红外气体分析仪进行测量。在某些情况下,还测定了叶绿素含量。1. 在SO气体暴露实验中,物种特异性差异明显。在完全水合状态下,暴露于0.5毫克SO/立方米14小时后,就能检测到SO对最敏感物种净光合作用和暗呼吸的影响。肺衣(Lobaria pulmonaria)的光合强度实际上受到了不可逆的损害。相比之下,最具抗性的物种在相同时间内用4毫克SO/立方米处理后仍能存活,其CO交换几乎没有或没有受到永久性损害。所研究的地衣物种对上述处理的反应使我们能够按照抗性降低的顺序对它们进行排列:石黄衣(Xanthoria parietina)(最具抗性)、鳞叶梅衣(Parmelia scortea)、杯状梅衣(Parmelia acetabulum)、粗皮松萝(Hypogymnia physodes)、岩梅衣(Parmelia saxatilis)、扁枝衣(Platismatia glauca)、肺衣(Labaria pumonaria)、狭叶梅衣(Parmelia stenophylla)、松萝(Evernia prunastri)。最敏感的物种松萝是典型的枝状地衣。从野外研究可知,具有这种生长形式的地衣特别敏感。2. 同一物种(如岩梅衣、肺衣)的例子,其对SO的抗性可能因其生长地点而异。形态和解剖特征(地衣体和皮层厚度)可能导致这些差异。3. 地衣对SO的敏感性与其水分状况密切相关。当水势降低时,SO的吸收减少,损伤也随之减少。干燥的地衣体在周围环境中高浓度SO下能存活而不受损害。4. 用NaSO溶液处理也显示出地衣抗性的物种特异性差异。然而,抗性降低的顺序与SO气体处理的顺序不同。光合作用的不可逆损害不一定与叶绿素的破坏相关。5. NaSO溶液(相同浓度)对地衣造成的损害与介质的pH密切相关。在低pH下,影响比高pH下更明显。这可以解释为由于损伤离子的浓度根据溶液的解离程度而变化;这取决于pH。根据莱维特(Levitt)的抗性概念对结果进行了讨论,即地衣对空气中SO的总抗性取决于两个组成部分,“避免”和“耐受”(见图15)。对地空气中特定SO浓度的抗性取决于地衣体吸收了多少SO,这在一定程度上受地衣体结构(生活形式、表面特征)和变水生物的水合程度的影响。地衣吸收的SO的毒性也可以降低;地衣体的pH及其缓冲能力(在一定程度上取决于地点和基质)在这个过程中起主导作用。除了这些“避免”因素外,地衣的总抗性还取决于敏感系统对SO的细胞质抗性(“耐受”)。由于NaSO溶液的影响,这种抗性类型会有相当大的偏差(例如由于地衣的发育状态)。在所研究的地衣物种中,总抗性(SO处理)和细胞质抗性(NaSO溶液处理)方面抗性顺序的差异表明了“避免”成分对生物体总抗性的重要性。从生态学角度来看,该研究支持了地衣对SO高度敏感的观点,即使在实际排放产生的浓度下也是如此。该研究还表明了对实验确定的抗性现象进行生态学解释的复杂性。