Sorci Gabriele, de Fraipont Michelle, Clobert Jean
Laboratoire d'Ecologie, CNRS URA 258, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Bât. A., 7ème étage, 7 quai St. Bernard, Case 237, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France Fax: (33)-1-44273516; e-mail:
Oecologia. 1997 Jul;111(2):183-188. doi: 10.1007/s004420050224.
Increased transmission of parasites and diseases is generally considered as a major cost of social life. In this study we tested the hypothesis regarding ectoparasites as a cost of living in crowded habitats in the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara). We used two approaches to explore this question. First, we tested if ectoparasite load and prevalence are positively correlated with host density in the field. Second, we experimentally tested if lizards avoid parasitized conspecifics. Contrary to expectation, we found that (1) ectoparasite load is negatively correlated with lizard density; (2) prevalence does not significantly increase with density; (3) unparasitized lizards do not avoid parasitized conspecifics but are attracted by them whatever their parasite load. These findings suggest that ectoparasites cannot be considered as a cost of living at high density in the common lizard, in spite of the potential negative impact mites may have on lizard fitness.
寄生虫和疾病传播的增加通常被认为是社会生活的一项主要代价。在本研究中,我们检验了关于外寄生虫是普通蜥蜴(胎生蜥蜴)生活在拥挤栖息地的一种代价的假设。我们采用了两种方法来探究这个问题。首先,我们测试了野外外寄生虫负荷和感染率是否与宿主密度呈正相关。其次,我们通过实验测试了蜥蜴是否会避开被寄生的同种个体。与预期相反,我们发现:(1)外寄生虫负荷与蜥蜴密度呈负相关;(2)感染率并未随密度显著增加;(3)未被寄生的蜥蜴不会避开被寄生的同种个体,而是无论其寄生虫负荷如何都会被它们吸引。这些发现表明,尽管螨类可能对蜥蜴的健康有潜在负面影响,但外寄生虫不能被视为普通蜥蜴高密度生活的一种代价。