Larson Katherine C
Department of Biology, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 72035, USA Fax: +1-501-4505914; e-mail:
Oecologia. 1998 Jun;115(1-2):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s004420050503.
The impact of herbivores on host plant photosynthetic rates can range from negative to positive. While defoliation by chewing herbivores can result in increases in photosynthesis followed by compensatory growth, other herbivore guilds, such as mesophyll feeders which damage photosynthetic leaf tissues, almost always reduce photosynthetic rates. The impact of galling herbivores on host photosynthesis has rarely been examined, even though the limited tissue disruption and the strong metabolic sinks induced by gall-forming herbivores could potentially stimulate photosynthetic rates. I examined the hypothesis that gall-inducing herbivores could stimulate photosynthesis in neighboring leaves in response to increased sink-demand by the gall. To address this hypothesis, I measured photosynthetic rates of galled leaves or leaflets, neighboring ungalled leaves or leaflets, and ungalled leaves or leaflets on ungalled shoots on naturally growing Prunus serotina (wild cherry) and Rhus glabra (smooth sumac). The leaves of wild cherry were galled by an eriophyid mite, Phytoptus cerasicrumena; the leaves of smooth sumac by an aphid, Melaphis rhois. I found that both species reduced the photosynthetic rates of the leaves or leaflets they galled from 24 to 52% compared to ungalled leaves in ungalled areas of the plants. Contrary to my hypothesis, mite galls on wild cherry reduced photosynthesis of neighboring ungalled leaves within the same shoot by 24% compared to ungalled leaves on gall-free shoots. Aphid galls on sumac leaflets did not significantly alter the photosynthetic rates of neighboring leaflets relative to ungalled leaves on ungalled shoots. Although gall-formers would appear to have the potential to stimulate photosynthesis in the same manner as defoliating herbivores, i.e., by increasing sink demand relative to source supply, I found only negative impacts on photosynthesis. I suggest that sink competition for nutrients between developing leaves and growing gall tissue may account for the negative impacts of sink-inducing gallers on photosynthesis.
食草动物对寄主植物光合速率的影响范围可从负面到正面。虽然咀嚼式食草动物造成的落叶会导致光合作用增强,随后出现补偿性生长,但其他食草动物类群,如破坏光合叶片组织的叶肉取食者,几乎总是会降低光合速率。尽管瘿蚊形成的瘿瘤对寄主光合作用的影响可能会刺激光合速率,因为其造成的组织破坏有限且诱导出强大的代谢库,但对瘿瘤食草动物对寄主光合作用的影响研究很少。我检验了这样一个假设:瘿瘤诱导食草动物会因瘿瘤对库需求的增加而刺激邻近叶片的光合作用。为了验证这个假设,我测量了自然生长的黑樱桃和光叶漆树上有瘿瘤的叶片或小叶、邻近未受瘿瘤影响的叶片或小叶以及未受瘿瘤影响的嫩枝上未受瘿瘤影响的叶片或小叶的光合速率。黑樱桃的叶片被一种瘿螨,即樱桃瘿螨形成瘿瘤;光叶漆的叶片被一种蚜虫,即盐肤木蚜形成瘿瘤。我发现,与植株未受瘿瘤影响区域的未受瘿瘤影响的叶片相比,这两种昆虫形成的瘿瘤都使它们所影响的叶片或小叶的光合速率降低了24%至52%。与我的假设相反,黑樱桃上的瘿螨瘿瘤使同一嫩枝上邻近未受瘿瘤影响的叶片的光合作用比无瘿瘤嫩枝上的未受瘿瘤影响的叶片降低了24%。光叶漆小叶上的蚜虫瘿瘤相对于未受瘿瘤影响的嫩枝上的未受瘿瘤影响的小叶,对邻近小叶的光合速率没有显著影响。尽管形成瘿瘤的昆虫似乎有可能像落叶食草动物一样刺激光合作用,即通过增加相对于源供应的库需求,但我发现其对光合作用只有负面影响。我认为,发育中的叶片和生长中的瘿瘤组织之间对养分的库竞争可能是诱导库形成的瘿瘤昆虫对光合作用产生负面影响的原因。