Neill William E
Institute of Animal Resource Ecology and Deparment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, V6T 1W5, Vancouver, Canada.
Oecologia. 1981 Mar;48(2):164-177. doi: 10.1007/BF00347959.
During ice-free seasons of 1975, 1977 and 1978, replicated experimental alteration of spring densities of predatory Chaoborus larvae inside 20-27 m enclosures in a fishless oligotrophic lake had relatively small, but significant, short-term effects upon prey species abundances. Enhancement of predator densities generally had greater numerical effects relative to controls than did complete removal of predators. With the exceptions Diaphanosoma and Bosmina under artificially elevated Chaoborus densities, numerical effects on prey species did not persist for more than a few weeks after midsummer in these 3 years. During cooler 1976, however, much larger Chaoborus effects in May and June persisted into September. Low temperatures and small initial population densities slowed population growth and tended to increase the proportion of each species' recruitment lost to Chaoborus predation. As water temperatures increased during 3 of 4 summers, rapid juvenile development and compensating increase in adult fertility generally permitted most prey species to escape regulation by these large, univoltine and semivoltine predators. With growing prey population size, declining food levels suppressed crustacean fecundity in July and August, thereby permitting predatory losses to climb again to substantial fractions of the reduced prey recruitment. Nevertheless, prey densities in predator-free and control or predator-enhanced enclosures differed little from July through September (except in 1976). Thus, summer population growth of most prey species seemed more limited by food shortages than by predators per se. Growth of individual zooplankters was affected by food availability during critical periods in July and August in all years, and Chaoborus predation seemed to influence the timing of this food limitation in at least 2 of the 4 years.
在1975年、1977年和1978年的无冰季节,在一个无鱼的贫营养湖泊中,对20 - 27米围栏内捕食性摇蚊幼虫的春季密度进行了重复的实验性改变,这对猎物物种的丰度产生了相对较小但显著的短期影响。相对于对照组,捕食者密度的增加通常在数量上产生的影响比完全去除捕食者更大。除了在人为提高的摇蚊密度下的透明溞和裸腹溞外,在这三年中,对猎物物种的数量影响在仲夏之后不会持续超过几周。然而,在较凉爽的1976年,5月和6月较大的摇蚊影响一直持续到9月。低温和较小的初始种群密度减缓了种群增长,并倾向于增加每个物种因摇蚊捕食而损失的补充量的比例。随着4个夏季中3个夏季水温的升高,快速的幼体发育和成年繁殖力的补偿性增加通常使大多数猎物物种能够逃脱这些大型、单化性和半化性捕食者的调控。随着猎物种群数量的增加,7月和8月食物水平的下降抑制了甲壳类动物的繁殖力,从而使捕食损失再次攀升至减少的猎物补充量的很大一部分。然而,从7月到9月,无捕食者围栏与对照或捕食者增强围栏中的猎物密度差异不大(1976年除外)。因此,大多数猎物物种的夏季种群增长似乎更多地受到食物短缺的限制,而不是捕食者本身。在所有年份中,7月和8月的关键时期,个体浮游动物的生长都受到食物供应的影响,并且在4年中的至少2年里,摇蚊捕食似乎影响了这种食物限制的时间。