Suppr超能文献

河口污损生物群落的发展:早期定殖者对后期定殖者的影响。

Development in an estuarine fouling community: The influence of early colonists on later arrivals.

作者信息

Dean T A, Hurd L E

机构信息

Section of Ecology and Organismic Biology, School of Life and Health Sciences, 19711, Newark, Delaware, USA.

College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, 19711, Newark, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1980 Sep;46(3):295-301. doi: 10.1007/BF00346255.

Abstract

Experiments were performed to determine if earlier colonists inhibited, enhanced, or were necessary for establishment of later colonists during development of an estuarine fouling community at Lewes, Delaware. We determined the significance of earlier stages on the successional process by functionally removing early colonizing species. Since settlement of sessile invertebrates onto our experimental test plates was seasonal, we were able to accomplish functional removal of early colonists by putting out clean test panels after these species had ceased settling. Comparisons between panels initially submerged at three different times in 1974 and 1975, and between panels put out at one-month intervals throughout the study (to describe seasonal settlement patterns) allowed us to determine interactions between adult populations of earlier colonists and colonizing individuals of later arriving species.The dominant sessile species in our system and their times of settlement were: a barnacle (Balanus improvisus) - April through June, a polychaete (Hydroides dianthus) - July and August, a tunicate (Molgula manhatensis) - June through October, a hydroid (Tubularia crocea) - July through October, and a mussel (Mytilus edulis) - November through April. All successional series eventually came to be dominated by M. edulis, and it persisted as the dominant for over a year.A variety of species interactions were observed. M. edulis inhibited colonization by all other dominants and B. improvisus partially inhibited settlement of M. manhattensis. The presence of adult M. manhattensis had no influence on summer settlement of T. crocea, but the hydroids enhanced settlement of tunicates in the fall. During both years of our study, larger settlements of mussels were noted on panels harboring tunicates and hydroids than on bare surfaces. H. dianthus, on the other hand, became established only on bare substrates, and colonization was almost totally inhibited by other dominants.Development in our fouling community did not conform to any single model of community development presented to date. Instead, components of several models were observed within our relatively simple (in terms of number of species) system. For example, facilitation (enhancement of later colonists by earlier ones) and inhibition (resistance of earlier colonists to invasion by later colonists) were both observed. However, we found no evidence earlier colonists were essential for establishment of the next developmental stage. In fact, inhibitory interactions appeared to be much more prevalent than facilitative interactions. The former may also have more profound effects on community development since they more often determine eventual species compositions.

摘要

进行了多项实验,以确定在特拉华州刘易斯的一个河口污损生物群落发育过程中,早期定殖者对后期定殖者的建立是否具有抑制、促进作用,或者是否必不可少。我们通过功能性去除早期定殖物种,来确定早期阶段对演替过程的重要性。由于固着无脊椎动物在我们的实验测试板上的附着具有季节性,所以在这些物种停止附着后,我们通过投放干净的测试板,实现了对早期定殖者的功能性去除。对1974年和1975年在三个不同时间最初浸入水中的测试板,以及在整个研究过程中每隔一个月投放的测试板(以描述季节性附着模式)进行比较,使我们能够确定早期定殖者的成体种群与后期到达物种的定殖个体之间的相互作用。我们系统中的主要固着物种及其附着时间分别为:一种藤壶(Balanus improvisus)——4月至6月,一种多毛类动物(Hydroides dianthus)——7月和8月,一种被囊动物(Molgula manhatensis)——6月至10月,一种水螅虫(Tubularia crocea)——7月至10月,以及一种贻贝(Mytilus edulis)——11月至次年4月。所有演替系列最终都以贻贝为主导,并且它作为优势种持续了一年多。

观察到了多种物种间的相互作用。贻贝抑制了所有其他优势种的定殖,而Balanus improvisus部分抑制了Molgula manhatensis的附着。成年Molgula manhatensis的存在对Tubularia crocea的夏季附着没有影响,但水螅虫在秋季促进了被囊动物的附着。在我们研究的两年中,与裸露表面相比,在有被囊动物和水螅虫的测试板上发现贻贝的附着量更大。另一方面,Hydroides dianthus仅在裸露基质上定殖,并且其定殖几乎完全受到其他优势种的抑制。

我们污损生物群落的发育并不符合迄今为止提出的任何单一群落发育模型。相反,在我们这个相对简单(就物种数量而言)的系统中,观察到了几种模型的组成部分。例如,既观察到了促进作用(早期物种对后期物种的促进),也观察到了抑制作用(早期物种对后期物种入侵的抵抗)。然而,我们没有发现证据表明早期定殖者对于下一个发育阶段的建立是必不可少的。事实上,抑制性相互作用似乎比促进性相互作用更为普遍。前者可能对群落发育也有更深远的影响,因为它们更常决定最终的物种组成。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验