den Boer P J
Nature Conservation Department, Biological Station of the Agricultural University, Kampsweg 27, 9418 PD, Wijster, The Netherlands.
Oecologia. 1988 Mar;75(2):161-168. doi: 10.1007/BF00378592.
Latto and Hassell (1987) disagree with the conclusion of Den Boer (1986), that the winter moth population at Wytham Wood, studied by Varley and Gradwell, was not regulated. They attempt to demonstrate regulation by means of a simulation model. In the present paper the validity of this model is tested step by step. The fixing of the initial and final densities, as practised by Den Boer and rejected by Latto and Hassell, did not prevent population explosions and extinctions, as was assumed by Latto and Hassell. It is shown that the deterministic formulation of the density dependence of pupal predation, as used by Latto and Hassell, deviates systematically from the field data. Replacing the values of the key-factor (k) by random values drawn from a normal distribution (Latto and Hassell) affects the dynamics such that the ability of pupal predation to govern density is improved in the model. Changing mortalities other than the key-factor does not significantly influence the pattern of fluctuations nor the limits of density. Models should leave intact the essentials of the reality under study, while removing distracting elements (Levins 1968). As both the timing of the key-factor, and its correlation with pupal predation are essential features of the winter moth population at Wytham Wood between 1950 and 1968, the model of Latto and Hassell does not apply to this population. By simply changing log (eggs/female) it is shown that the power of the density dependence of pupal predation to govern possible trends in density of the winter moth population at Wytham Wood is weak. On the other hand, the model of Latto and Hassell gives insight into the conditions that might favour regulation of numbers. Although the model of Poethke and Kirchberg (1987) preserves more features of the pertinent winter moth population than that of Latto and Hassell (1987) it still deviates in one essential aspect: the succession in time of both the (coupled) mortalities and the deviations from the deterministic density dependence are taken at random. Therefore, also this model is still too far from the field population to be a sound base for the statistical speculation proposed by Poethke and Kirchberg.
拉托和哈塞尔(1987年)不同意登布尔(1986年)的结论,即瓦利和格拉德韦尔研究的怀瑟姆森林中的冬尺蠖种群没有受到调控。他们试图通过一个模拟模型来证明调控的存在。在本文中,该模型的有效性被逐步检验。登布尔所采用、但被拉托和哈塞尔否定的初始密度和最终密度的设定,并没有像拉托和哈塞尔所假定的那样,防止种群爆发和灭绝。研究表明,拉托和哈塞尔所使用的蛹期捕食密度依赖性的确定性公式与实地数据存在系统性偏差。用从正态分布中抽取的随机值替代关键因子(k)的值(拉托和哈塞尔的做法)会影响动态变化,使得模型中蛹期捕食控制密度的能力得到提升。改变关键因子以外的死亡率对波动模式和密度极限没有显著影响。模型应该保留所研究现实的本质,同时去除干扰因素(莱文斯,1968年)。由于关键因子的时间安排及其与蛹期捕食的相关性都是1950年至1968年间怀瑟姆森林中冬尺蠖种群的基本特征,拉托和哈塞尔的模型并不适用于这个种群。通过简单改变对数(卵数/雌虫数)可以看出,蛹期捕食密度依赖性控制怀瑟姆森林中冬尺蠖种群密度可能趋势的能力较弱。另一方面,拉托和哈塞尔的模型让我们了解到可能有利于数量调控的条件。尽管波埃特克和基尔希贝格(1987年)的模型比拉托和哈塞尔(1987年)的模型保留了更多相关冬尺蠖种群的特征,但它在一个关键方面仍然存在偏差:(耦合的)死亡率和与确定性密度依赖性的偏差在时间上的相继发生是随机的。因此,这个模型与实地种群仍然相差甚远,无法成为波埃特克和基尔希贝格所提出的统计推测的可靠基础。