den Boer P J
Biological Station, Wijster, Kampsweg 27, 9418PD, Wijster, The Netherlands.
Oecologia. 1986 Jul;69(4):507-512. doi: 10.1007/BF00410355.
The claim of Varley and Gradwell that the highly density-dependent pupal predation (k ) in the population of the winter moth in Wytham Wood, England would keep density within limits (regulate) is compared in this paper with the density limits in the null model: pupal predation causes the same mean generation mortality (35%) as in the field, but is not density-dependent, i.e. either constant or randomly fluctuating between years according to the actual frequency distribution, ceteris paribus. According to this null model the winter moth would have fluctuated between narrower limits than in the field; the claim of Varley & Gradwell must thus be rejected. It is more generally concluded that a regulating factor should be the key factor, but this is not a sufficient condition. It should also prevent in some way the low throughs in the time series that usually accompany the operation of a dominating density-dependent mortality factor.
本文将瓦尔利和格拉德韦尔的观点,即英格兰怀瑟姆森林中冬尺蠖种群内高度依赖密度的蛹期捕食(k)会将种群密度控制在一定范围内(起到调节作用),与零模型中的密度限制进行了比较:蛹期捕食导致的平均世代死亡率(35%)与野外相同,但不依赖密度,即根据实际频率分布,要么保持恒定,要么在不同年份随机波动,其他条件相同。根据这个零模型,冬尺蠖的波动范围应比野外更窄;因此,瓦尔利和格拉德韦尔的观点必须被否定。更普遍的结论是,一个调节因素应该是关键因素,但这不是充分条件。它还应该以某种方式防止时间序列中通常伴随主导的依赖密度的死亡率因素运作而出现的低谷。