Baruch Z, Ludlow M M, Davis R
Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, CSIRO, 306 Carmody Road, 4067, St. Lucia, Q., Australia.
Oecologia. 1985 Oct;67(3):388-393. doi: 10.1007/BF00384945.
Introduced African grasses are invading the grasslands of the Venezuelan savannas and displacing the native grasses. This work, which is part of a program to understand the reasons for the success of the African grasses, specifically investigates whether introduced and native grasses differ in some photosynthetic characteristics.The responses to photon flux density, leaf temperature, leaf-air vapour pressure difference and leaf water potential of leaf photosynthetic rate of two introduced African C grasses (Hyparrhenia rufa and Melinis minutiflora) and of a lowland and a highland population of a native Venezuelan grass (Trachypogon plumosus) grown under controlled conditions were compared. These responses in all three species were typical of tropical C pasture grasses. The introduced grasses had higher maximum leaf conductance, net photosynthetic rates, and optimum temperature (H. rufa only) for photosynthesis than T. plumosus. However, T. plumosus was able to continue photosynthesis to lower leaf water potentials than the two introduced grasses, and the efficiency which it utilized water, light and mineral nutrients to fix carbon were similar to those of the introduced grasses.The higher rates of leaf photosynthesis of the introduced grasses contributed to, but only partially explained, the higher growth rates compared to T. plumosus. The higher growth rates and nutrient concentration of the introduced grasses are consistent with their ability to establish rapidly, compete successfully for resources, and displace T. plumosus from moist, fertile sites. Conversely, the slower growth rate, lower nutrient concentrations, and superior water relations characteristics are consistent with the capacity of T. plumosus to resist invasion by introduced grasses in poorer sites.
引进的非洲草正在侵入委内瑞拉稀树草原的草地,并取代本地草种。这项工作是了解非洲草成功原因计划的一部分,专门研究引进草种和本地草种在某些光合特性上是否存在差异。比较了两种引进的非洲C4草(红苞茅和细柄草)以及委内瑞拉本地草(羽花针茅)低地和高地种群在可控条件下生长时,叶片光合速率对光子通量密度、叶片温度、叶-气蒸汽压差和叶片水势的响应。这三个物种的这些响应都是热带C4牧场草的典型特征。引进的草种比羽花针茅具有更高的最大叶片导度、净光合速率和光合作用最适温度(仅红苞茅)。然而,羽花针茅在叶片水势比两种引进草种更低时仍能继续进行光合作用,并且其利用水分、光照和矿质养分固定碳的效率与引进草种相似。引进草种较高的叶片光合速率有助于其比羽花针茅具有更高的生长速率,但只能部分解释这一现象。引进草种较高的生长速率和养分浓度与其能够迅速定植、成功竞争资源以及从湿润、肥沃的地点取代羽花针茅的能力相一致。相反,羽花针茅较慢的生长速率、较低的养分浓度以及优越的水分关系特性与其在较差地点抵抗引进草种入侵的能力相一致。