Suppr超能文献

扩散与田鼠周期:两种假说的比较

Dispersal and the microtine cycle: comparison of two hypotheses.

作者信息

Warkowska-Dratnal Helena, Stenseth Nils Chr

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Biology, Jagiellonian University, Karasia 6, PL-30-060, Cracow, Poland.

Department of Biology, Division of Zoology, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1050, N-0316, Oslo 3, Norway.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1985 Mar;65(4):468-477. doi: 10.1007/BF00379659.

Abstract

The hypotheses suggested by Chitty (1960) and by Charnov and Finerty (1980) in order to explain the occurrence of the microtine density cycle are investigated from a theoretical point of view. The former hypothesis assumes that the polymorphic behavioural patterns being observed in natural populations are genetically determined whereas the latter assumes these polymorphic behavioural patterns to be environmentally determined. For both theories we assume a patchy environment with dispersal between patches.We find, on the basis of a series of mathematical models comparing the two hypotheses, that Chitty's hypothesis does not seem to generate cycles whereas the Charnov-Finerty hypothesis may generate persistent density cycles: this is particularly so if dispersing individuals have the capacity to choose which patch to settle in and if the carrying capacity of each patch is high.

摘要

从理论角度对奇蒂(1960年)以及查诺夫和芬纳蒂(1980年)为解释田鼠密度周期的出现而提出的假说进行了研究。前一种假说假定在自然种群中观察到的多态行为模式是由基因决定的,而后一种假说则假定这些多态行为模式是由环境决定的。对于这两种理论,我们都假设存在一个斑块状环境,且斑块之间有扩散现象。基于一系列比较这两种假说的数学模型,我们发现,奇蒂的假说似乎不会产生周期,而查诺夫 - 芬纳蒂假说可能会产生持续的密度周期:如果扩散个体有能力选择定居在哪个斑块,并且每个斑块的承载能力较高,情况尤其如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验