Immelmann Klaus
Zoologisches Institut der Technischen Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Deutschland.
Oecologia. 1972 Sep;9(3):259-264. doi: 10.1007/BF00345235.
The use of the terms, which have not always been employed uniformly throughout the literature, is discussed and an exact definition is tried. Application of the terms "ultimate" and "proximate factors" should not be restricted to annual and circadian periodicities. Instead they should be used for all temporally or spatially restricted processes for which a difference between selecting and regulating mechanisms is to be found. "Ultimate factors" are environmental factors which in the course of evolution have led, through natural selection, to the relevant restriction. Proximate factors may be defined as those external stimuli which initiate or maintain biological processes under most favourable ecological conditions. The term "Zeitgeber" finally, should only be used where endogenous circadian or circennial periodicities are synchronized with environmental changes through external factors. In this sense "Zeitgeber" is merely a special case of "proximate factor".
本文讨论了这些术语在文献中的使用情况,它们并不总是统一的,并尝试给出一个确切的定义。“终极”和“近端因素”这两个术语的应用不应局限于年度和昼夜节律。相反,它们应用于所有在时间或空间上受到限制的过程,在这些过程中可以发现选择和调节机制之间的差异。“终极因素”是指在进化过程中通过自然选择导致相关限制的环境因素。近端因素可定义为在最有利的生态条件下启动或维持生物过程的外部刺激。最后,“授时因子”这个术语只应在通过外部因素使内源性昼夜节律或周年节律与环境变化同步的情况下使用。从这个意义上说,“授时因子”仅仅是“近端因素”的一个特殊情况。