Roberts Alan, Stone Lewis
Graduate School of Environmental Science, Monash University, 3168, Clayton, Vic., Australia.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, 3052, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
Oecologia. 1990 Jul;83(4):560-567. doi: 10.1007/BF00317210.
Diamond (1975) formulated "assembly rules" for avian species on islands in an archipelago, which made a successful colonisation depend essentially on which other species were present. Critically examining these rules, Connor and Simberloff (1979) maintained that, in the Vanuatu (New Hebrides) archipelago, the field data on species distribution was quite compatible with a null hypothesis, in which species colonise at random with no species interaction. Their work was in turn criticised (Diamond and Gilpin (1982), Gilpin and Diamond (1982)) and a vigorous controversy has ensued.Here we contribute a method in which a simple but hitherto neglected statistic is used as a probe: the number of islands shared by a pair of species, with its first and second moments. The matrix of these sharing values is given as a simple product of the incidence matrix, and its properties are examined - first, for the field data, and then in the random ensemble used by Connor and Simberloff (1979). It is shown that their constraints hold constant the mean number shared, so that any fall in the number that one pair of species share, due to their excluding each other, must imply a rise in the number shared by some other species pair-i.e., an aggregation.Turning to the second moment of the numbers shared, it is shown that its value in the Vanuatu field data exceeds the largest value to be found in a sample of 1000 matrices, these latter being constructed so that they obey the Connor and Simberloff constraints but are otherwise random. This indicates that exclusion and/or aggregation effects are present in the actual distribution of species, which are not catered for by the null hypothesis.The observed distribution thus emerges as much more exceptional than found by Connor and Simberloff (1979), and even by Diamond and Gilpin (1982), when examining the same ensemble. The reason for this disagreement are sought, and some cautions are offered, supported by numerical evidence, concerning the use of the chi-square test when the data points involved are mutually dependent.
戴蒙德(1975年)为群岛上的鸟类物种制定了“组装规则”,该规则认为成功的殖民化基本上取决于其他哪些物种存在。康纳和辛伯洛夫(1979年)对这些规则进行了批判性审视,他们坚持认为,在瓦努阿图(新赫布里底群岛)群岛,关于物种分布的实地数据与一个零假设相当吻合,即在该假设中物种随机殖民,不存在物种间相互作用。他们的工作反过来受到了批评(戴蒙德和吉尔平(1982年),吉尔平与戴蒙德(1982年)),随后引发了一场激烈的争论。在此,我们提供一种方法,其中一个简单但迄今被忽视的统计量被用作探测工具:一对物种共有的岛屿数量及其一阶和二阶矩。这些共享值的矩阵作为发生率矩阵的简单乘积给出,并对其性质进行研究——首先针对实地数据,然后针对康纳和辛伯洛夫(1979年)使用的随机集合。结果表明,他们的约束条件使共享的平均数量保持不变,因此,由于一对物种相互排斥导致它们共享的数量减少,必然意味着其他一些物种对共享的数量增加——即聚集现象。再看共享数量的二阶矩,结果表明其在瓦努阿图实地数据中的值超过了在1000个矩阵样本中能找到的最大值,后一种矩阵的构建方式是使其遵循康纳和辛伯洛夫的约束条件,但在其他方面是随机的。这表明在物种的实际分布中存在排斥和/或聚集效应,而零假设并未考虑到这些。因此,观察到的分布比康纳和辛伯洛夫(1979年)甚至戴蒙德和吉尔平(1982年)在研究相同集合时所发现的情况更为特殊。我们探寻了这种分歧的原因,并通过数值证据给出了一些关于在数据点相互依赖时使用卡方检验需谨慎的建议。