Loehle C
Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, SC 29801.
Q Rev Biol. 1987 Dec;62(4):397-409. doi: 10.1086/415619.
Proper hypothesis testing is the subject of much debate in ecology. According to studies in cognitive psychology, confirmation bias (a tendency to seek confirming evidence) and theory tenacity (persistent belief in a theory in spite of contrary evidence) pervasively influence actual problem solving and hypothesis testing, often interfering with effective testing of alternative hypotheses. On the other hand, these psychological factors play a positive role in the process of theory maturation by helping to protect and nurture a new idea until it is suitable for critical evaluation. As a theory matures it increases in empirical content and its predictions become more distinct. Efficient hypothesis testing is often not possible when theories are in an immature state, as is the case in much of ecology. Problem areas in ecology are examined in light of these considerations, including failure to publish negative results, misuses of mathematical models, confusion resulting from ambiguous terms (such as "diversity" and "niche"), and biases against new ideas.
恰当的假设检验在生态学领域是一个备受争议的话题。根据认知心理学的研究,证实性偏差(寻求证实性证据的倾向)和理论固执(尽管有相反证据仍坚持相信一种理论)普遍影响实际问题的解决和假设检验,常常干扰对替代假设的有效检验。另一方面,这些心理因素在理论成熟过程中发挥着积极作用,通过帮助保护和培育一个新观点,直到它适合进行批判性评估。随着理论的成熟,其经验内容会增加,预测也会变得更加明确。当理论处于不成熟状态时,高效的假设检验往往是不可能的,生态学中的许多情况就是如此。基于这些考虑因素,我们审视了生态学中的问题领域,包括未发表负面结果、数学模型的滥用、因模糊术语(如“多样性”和“生态位”)导致的混淆以及对新观点的偏见。