Eisenberg Robert M, Hurd L E, Ketcham Robert B
Ecology Program, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Delaware, 19716, Newark, DE, USA.
Oecologia. 1989 Jun;79(4):458-462. doi: 10.1007/BF00378661.
A guild of cellular slime molds (CSM) consisting of two isolates from each of five species, representing two genera, and obtained from the same square meter of forest soil exhibited extensive growth rate variation when tested on a suite of 18 bacteria isolated from the same soil. Significant growth rate differences were found at each taxonomic level examined: among species of different genera, between genera, among species within genera, and between isolates (=clones) within species. The type of bacteria used as prey determined the relative rank of the growth rates in different CSM isolates, as well as the taxonomic level at which significant differences were found. We suggest a possible reconciliation between a previous hypothesis, based on competition, and contradictory experimental work on resource partitioning in this guild of bacterial predators. Our results raise a question about the efficacy of using single genotypes to represent a species when ecological ideas are developed through laboratory investigations.
一个由来自五个物种(代表两个属)中每个物种的两个分离株组成的细胞黏菌(CSM)群落,从同一平方米的森林土壤中获得,当在从同一土壤中分离出的一组18种细菌上进行测试时,表现出广泛的生长速率变化。在检查的每个分类水平上都发现了显著的生长速率差异:在不同属的物种之间、属之间、属内物种之间以及物种内的分离株(=克隆)之间。用作猎物的细菌类型决定了不同CSM分离株中生长速率的相对排名,以及发现显著差异的分类水平。我们提出了一个基于竞争的先前假设与关于这个细菌捕食者群落中资源分配的矛盾实验工作之间可能的调和。我们的结果提出了一个问题,即在通过实验室研究发展生态概念时,使用单一基因型来代表一个物种的有效性。