Fritz R S, Nichols-Orians C M, Brunsfeld S J
Department of Biology, Vassar College, 12601, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA.
Department of Biology, Williams College, 01267, Williamstown, MA, USA.
Oecologia. 1994 Feb;97(1):106-117. doi: 10.1007/BF00317914.
We studied the morphology, molecular genetics, and hebivory of two species of willows (Salix sericea and S. eriocephala) and their interspecific hybrids to test four alternative hypotheses concerning the effects of hybridization on plant resistance. Individually marked plants were identified using morphological traits in the field and measurements of stipule and leaf pubescence were made and compared using Canonical Discriminant Function Analysis. DNA was extracted from the leaves of a sample of the marked plants and RAPD-PCR analysis was performed to establish the genetic status of parental and hybrid plants. RAPD band analysis generally verified the genetic status of parental plants. Hybrid plants were usually correctly identified in the field with a few exceptions. However, the hybrid plants were a heterogeneous group of plants made up of most plants that appear to be Fs and a few plants that appear to be backcrosses to S. sericea. Morphological variables were useful for distinguishing S. sericea from S. eriocephala and hybrids, but were not as dependable in distinguishing between S. eriocephala and hybrids. We compared the densities of 11 herbivore species and the infection by a leaf rust pathogen (Melampsora sp.) on the leaves and stems of two parents and the hybrids in the field. We found support for the Additive hypothesis (3 species), the Dominance hypothesis (2 species) and the Hybrid Susceptibility hypothesis (7 species, 6 herbivores and the Melampsora rust). We found no evidence for the Hybrid Resistance hypothesis. Guild membership was not a good predictor of similar responses of species to hybrid versus parental plants. A Canonical Discriminant Function Analysis showed discrete separation of the taxa based on herbivore densities, illustrating different community structures on hybrid and parental plants. This study demonstrates the diversity of responses of phytophages in response to interspecific hybridization.
我们研究了两种柳树(绢柳和毛头柳)及其种间杂种的形态学、分子遗传学和食草作用,以检验关于杂交对植物抗性影响的四个替代假说。在野外利用形态特征对单独标记的植株进行识别,并对托叶和叶片毛被进行测量,然后使用典型判别函数分析进行比较。从标记植株样本的叶片中提取DNA,并进行随机扩增多态性DNA聚合酶链反应(RAPD-PCR)分析,以确定亲本和杂种植物的遗传状况。RAPD条带分析一般验证了亲本植物的遗传状况。杂种植物在野外通常能被正确识别,但有少数例外。然而,杂种植物是一个异质的植物群体,大多数植株似乎是F1代,少数植株似乎是与绢柳的回交后代。形态变量有助于区分绢柳和毛头柳以及杂种,但在区分毛头柳和杂种方面可靠性较差。我们比较了野外两种亲本及其杂种的叶片和茎上11种草食动物的密度以及叶锈病病原菌(栅锈菌属)的感染情况。我们发现支持加性假说(3种)、显性假说(2种)和杂种易感性假说(7种,6种草食动物和栅锈菌)。我们没有找到支持杂种抗性假说的证据。功能群归属并不是物种对杂种植物与亲本植物类似反应的良好预测指标。典型判别函数分析表明,基于草食动物密度,各分类单元离散分离,说明了杂种植物和亲本植物上不同的群落结构。这项研究证明了植食性动物对种间杂交反应的多样性。