Ryel R I, Caldwell M M, Beyschlag W
Deparment of Range Science and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, 84322-5230, Logan, UT, USA.
Lenrstuhl Botanik II, Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften, Mittlerer Dallenbergweg 64, D-97082, Würzburg, Germany.
Oecologia. 1994 Aug;98(3-4):241-246. doi: 10.1007/BF00324210.
Although the tussock growth form of caespitose graminoids is widespread, the effect of this growth form on light interception and carbon gain of tillers has received little attention. Daily incident photosynthetic photon flux density (PFD) and carbon gain in monospecific stands of tussock grasses were compared with those of a hypothetical distribution with the equivalent tiller density per total ground area, but evenly distributed rather than clumped in tussocks. This was computed for two tussock grasses Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) A. Löve (bluebunch wheatgrass) and Agropyron desertorum (Fisch, ex Link) Schult. (creasted wheatgrass) at different plant densities. Daily PFD and net photosynthesis (A) were greater if tillers were distributed uniformly rather than clumped in tussocks, except when the density of tussocks was so great as to approach a uniform canopy. When tussock density per ground area was low, much of the difference between tussock and uniform tiller densities in PFD and A was due to shading within the tussocks; up to 50-60% of the potential carbon gain was lost in A. desertorum due to shading within tussocks. In a matrix of tussocks, the light field for establishing seedlings was very heterogeneous; potential A ranged from 7 to 96% relative to an isolated seedling. The mean of daily PFD and A for seedlings in a tussock stand were nearly identical to the values in corresponding stands of uniform tiller distributions. It is hypothesized that the loss of A resulting from clumping tillers into tussocks is offset by benefits of protecting sequestered belowground resources from invasion by seedlings of competitors.
尽管丛生禾本科植物的草丛生长形式很普遍,但这种生长形式对分蘖的光截获和碳获取的影响却很少受到关注。将草丛禾本科植物单种 stands 的每日光合有效辐射(PFD)和碳获取与每单位总面积具有相同分蘖密度但均匀分布而非丛生于草丛中的假设分布进行了比较。针对两种草丛禾本科植物,即假鹅观草(Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) A. Löve,蓝茎冰草)和沙生冰草(Agropyron desertorum (Fisch, ex Link) Schult.,扁穗冰草),在不同植株密度下进行了计算。如果分蘖均匀分布而非丛生于草丛中,每日 PFD 和净光合作用(A)会更大,除非草丛密度非常大以至于接近均匀冠层。当地面单位面积的草丛密度较低时,草丛和均匀分蘖密度在 PFD 和 A 方面的许多差异是由于草丛内部的遮荫造成的;在沙生冰草中,由于草丛内部遮荫,高达 50 - 60%的潜在碳获取损失掉了。在草丛矩阵中,用于幼苗定植的光场非常不均匀;相对于孤立幼苗,潜在 A 的范围为 7%至 96%。草丛 stand 中幼苗的每日 PFD 和 A 的平均值与均匀分蘖分布的相应 stand 中的值几乎相同。据推测,分蘖丛生成草丛导致的 A 的损失被保护地下资源免受竞争幼苗入侵的益处所抵消。